GTR vs. APRQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GTR (WisdomTree Target Range Fund) and APRQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. GTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for APRQ.

Performance

GTR vs. APRQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GTR

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 8.44%
• 6M: 8.61%
• 1Y: 19.56%
• 3Y*: 12.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTR vs. APRQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GTR WisdomTree Target Range Fund	5.16%
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April	0.00%

GTR vs. APRQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GTR	APRQ
Technology	27.5%	32.0%
Financial Services	15.9%	13.7%
Industrials	12.1%	7.4%
Healthcare	9.8%	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	11.6%
Communication Services	7.7%	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	5.5%
Energy	4.2%	3.2%
Basic Materials	3.7%	1.7%
Utilities	2.7%	2.5%
Real Estate	2.7%	2.1%

Return for Risk

GTR vs. APRQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTR

GTR Risk / Return Rank: 66
GTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
GTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
GTR Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
GTR Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTR vs. APRQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTR	APRQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.06	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTR	APRQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	—	—

Drawdowns

GTR vs. APRQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTR drawdown since its inception was -21.44%, which is greater than APRQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTR and APRQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTR	APRQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.44%	0.00%	-21.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	0.00%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.63%	0.00%	-8.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GTR	APRQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.36%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.45%	0.00%	+9.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.86%	0.00%	+10.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.86%	0.00%	+10.86%

GTR vs. APRQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than APRQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTR vs. APRQ - Dividend Comparison

GTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, while APRQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GTR WisdomTree Target Range Fund	5.30%	5.74%	5.30%	2.85%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, GTR or APRQ?

On fees, GTR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTR or APRQ?

GTR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APRQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTR or APRQ?

GTR has the higher dividend yield at 5.30%, compared with 0.00% for APRQ.

What is the main difference between GTR and APRQ?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GTR and 0.79% for APRQ.