GTR vs. APRP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GTR (WisdomTree Target Range Fund) and APRP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GTR returned 19.56% vs 17.99% for APRP. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for APRP.

Performance

GTR vs. APRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTR achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly lower than APRP's 9.52% return.

GTR

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 8.44%
• 6M: 8.61%
• 1Y: 19.56%
• 3Y*: 12.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRP

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 1.68%
• YTD: 9.52%
• 6M: 10.45%
• 1Y: 17.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTR vs. APRP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GTR WisdomTree Target Range Fund	8.44%	12.90%	5.07%
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April	9.52%	7.80%	10.28%

Correlation

The correlation between GTR and APRP is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	0.84

The correlation between GTR and APRP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GTR vs. APRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTR

GTR Risk / Return Rank: 66
GTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
GTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
GTR Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
GTR Martin Ratio Rank: 71

APRP

APRP Risk / Return Rank: 98
APRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
APRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
APRP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
APRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
APRP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTR vs. APRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTR	APRP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	4.17	-2.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	7.14	-4.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	2.04	-0.67
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	16.60	-13.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.06	74.06	-61.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GTR vs. APRP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is lower than the APRP Sharpe Ratio of 4.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTR and APRP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTR	APRP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	4.17	-2.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	1.37	-0.91

Drawdowns

GTR vs. APRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTR drawdown since its inception was -21.44%, which is greater than APRP's maximum drawdown of -13.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTR and APRP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTR	APRP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.44%	-13.66%	-7.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	-1.09%	-4.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.02%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.63%	-1.23%	-7.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.50%	0.24%	+1.26%

Volatility

GTR vs. APRP - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) has a higher volatility of 2.36% compared to PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) at 1.13%. This indicates that GTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTR	APRP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.36%	1.13%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.88%	3.37%	+3.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.45%	4.33%	+5.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.86%	9.48%	+1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.86%	9.48%	+1.38%

GTR vs. APRP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than APRP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTR vs. APRP - Dividend Comparison

GTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, while APRP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GTR WisdomTree Target Range Fund	5.30%	5.74%	5.30%	2.85%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTR and APRP in my portfolio?

GTR and APRP have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTR or APRP?

GTR has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to APRP (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTR dropped -21.44% vs APRP's -13.66%.

Which ETF is better, GTR or APRP?

On 1-year performance, GTR leads with 19.56% vs 17.99% for APRP. On fees, APRP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, APRP has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GTR or APRP?

Over the 1-year period, GTR has performed better with a 19.56% return vs 17.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTR or APRP?

APRP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTR or APRP?

GTR has the higher dividend yield at 5.30%, compared with 0.00% for APRP.

What is the main difference between GTR and APRP?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GTR and 0.50% for APRP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.17 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.