GTOQ vs. NHYB
GTOQ (Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF) and NHYB (Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. GTOQ is actively managed, while NHYB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GTOQ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for NHYB.
Performance
GTOQ vs. NHYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTOQ achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than NHYB's 1.96% return.
GTOQ
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 6.53%
- 3Y*
- 9.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
NHYB
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTOQ vs. NHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GTOQ Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF | 1.79% | 1.00% |
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.96% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTOQ and NHYB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTOQ vs. NHYB — Risk / Return Rank
GTOQ
NHYB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GTOQ vs. NHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF (GTOQ) and Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTOQ | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTOQ vs. NHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTOQ drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, which is greater than NHYB's maximum drawdown of -2.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOQ and NHYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTOQ | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -2.40% | -13.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.15% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.28% | -0.36% | -2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | — | — |
Volatility
GTOQ vs. NHYB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTOQ | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67% | 3.65% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.72% | 3.65% | +2.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.51% | 3.65% | +1.86% |
GTOQ vs. NHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTOQ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than NHYB's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTOQ vs. NHYB - Dividend Comparison
GTOQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, more than NHYB's 4.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTOQ Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF | 7.40% | 7.04% | 7.20% | 6.76% | 6.17% | 4.86% |
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 4.24% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTOQ and NHYB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NHYB is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NHYB is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GTOQ.
GTOQ has the higher dividend yield at 7.40%, compared with 4.24% for NHYB.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GTOQ and 0.08% for NHYB.
Find the right allocation for GTOQ and NHYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer