PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTOQ vs. HYZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTOQ vs. HYZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF (GTOQ) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTOQ achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than HYZD's 3.50% return.


GTOQ

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.26%
6M
1.10%
YTD
1.80%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
8.14%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.19%

HYZD

1D
0.15%
1M
0.51%
6M
2.66%
YTD
3.50%
1Y
7.45%
3Y*
8.44%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
5.36%
ALL TIME*
4.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$55.75K$50.01K$1.37M
$1.53M$1.90M$1.53M

GTOQ vs. HYZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GTOQ
Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
1.80%8.04%8.13%14.17%-12.17%5.37%0.38%
HYZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund
3.50%7.67%9.39%11.17%-2.35%6.27%1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GTOQ and HYZD is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020

0.47

The correlation between GTOQ and HYZD shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTOQ vs. HYZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GTOQ
GTOQ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GTOQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTOQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTOQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GTOQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTOQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

HYZD
HYZD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HYZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYZD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HYZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYZD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GTOQ vs. HYZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF (GTOQ) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTOQHYZDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.48

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

3.66

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.87

15.97

-8.10

GTOQ vs. HYZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTOQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the HYZD Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTOQ and HYZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTOQ vs. HYZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTOQ drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, smaller than the maximum HYZD drawdown of -25.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOQ and HYZD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTOQHYZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.96%

-25.66%

+9.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.95%

-1.91%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.25%

-5.85%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.96%

-8.97%

-6.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

0.00%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-2.18%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

0.44%

+0.25%

Volatility

GTOQ vs. HYZD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF (GTOQ) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund (HYZD) at 0.44%. This indicates that GTOQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTOQHYZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

0.44%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

2.39%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62%

3.01%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.72%

6.69%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.46%

8.50%

-3.04%

GTOQ vs. HYZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTOQ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than HYZD's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTOQ vs. HYZD - Dividend Comparison

GTOQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, more than HYZD's 5.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTOQ
Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
6.88%7.04%7.20%6.76%6.17%4.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond Fund
5.89%6.05%6.08%5.94%5.14%4.02%5.13%5.50%5.58%4.94%5.07%4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTOQ and HYZD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTOQ has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to HYZD (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTOQ dropped -15.96% vs HYZD's -25.66%.

On 5-year performance, HYZD leads with 6.27% vs 3.76% for GTOQ. On fees, GTOQ is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, HYZD has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYZD has performed better with a 6.27% return vs 3.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GTOQ is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HYZD.

GTOQ has the higher dividend yield at 6.88%, compared with 5.89% for HYZD.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GTOQ and 0.43% for HYZD.

HYZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTOQ and HYZD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer