GTOQ vs. BBHY
GTOQ (Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF) and BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. GTOQ is actively managed, while BBHY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GTOQ returned 3.98%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for BBHY. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTOQ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBHY.
Performance
GTOQ vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTOQ achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than BBHY's 1.73% return.
GTOQ
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 6.99%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- —
BBHY
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 7.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
GTOQ vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTOQ Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF | 1.57% | 8.04% | 8.13% | 14.17% | -12.17% | 5.37% | 0.38% |
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.73% | 8.51% | 7.81% | 11.98% | -10.37% | 3.88% | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTOQ and BBHY is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020 | 0.74 |
The correlation between GTOQ and BBHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTOQ vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank
GTOQ
BBHY
GTOQ vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF (GTOQ) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTOQ | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 3.00 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.21 | 13.50 | -3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTOQ | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 1.97 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.57 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.64 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
GTOQ vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTOQ drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOQ and BBHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTOQ | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -24.98% | +9.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.95% | -2.37% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.25% | -5.00% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.96% | -15.32% | -0.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.14% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -2.37% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 0.53% | +0.16% |
Volatility
GTOQ vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF (GTOQ) is 0.97%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that GTOQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTOQ | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 1.13% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 2.85% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.60% | 3.62% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.71% | 7.26% | -1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.52% | 7.53% | -2.01% |
GTOQ vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTOQ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTOQ vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison
GTOQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.80%, less than BBHY's 6.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.94% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% |
GTOQ Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF | 6.80% | 7.04% | 7.20% | 6.76% | 6.17% | 4.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, GTOQ and BBHY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BBHY has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to GTOQ (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTOQ dropped -15.96% vs BBHY's -24.98%.
On 5-year performance, BBHY leads with 4.12% vs 3.98% for GTOQ. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GTOQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBHY has performed better with a 4.12% return vs 3.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GTOQ.
BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 6.80% for GTOQ.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GTOQ and 0.15% for BBHY.
BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTOQ and BBHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer