GTOH vs. HYHG
GTOH (Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF) and HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) are both High Yield Bonds funds. GTOH is actively managed, while HYHG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GTOH returned 7.86%/yr vs 9.69%/yr for HYHG. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTOH charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HYHG.
Performance
GTOH vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTOH achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than HYHG's 2.90% return.
GTOH
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 6.97%
- 3Y*
- 7.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYHG
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 3.60%
- 1Y
- 7.32%
- 3Y*
- 9.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
GTOH vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTOH Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF | 1.66% | 7.91% | 6.57% | 10.54% | -1.34% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 2.90% | 5.31% | 11.41% | 14.69% | -1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTOH and HYHG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2022 | 0.51 |
The correlation between GTOH and HYHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTOH vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank
GTOH
HYHG
GTOH vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF (GTOH) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTOH | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.24 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.64 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.02 | 11.96 | +3.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTOH | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 1.32 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 0.46 | +1.17 |
Drawdowns
GTOH vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTOH drawdown since its inception was -4.77%, smaller than the maximum HYHG drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOH and HYHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTOH | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -25.71% | +20.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.29% | -2.02% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.13% | -7.47% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.45% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -3.04% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.47% | 0.61% | -0.14% |
Volatility
GTOH vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF (GTOH) is 0.82%, while ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) has a volatility of 1.45%. This indicates that GTOH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTOH | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.82% | 1.45% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.30% | 4.33% | -2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99% | 5.56% | -2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 8.16% | -3.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 9.15% | -4.68% |
GTOH vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTOH has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTOH vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison
GTOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, less than HYHG's 6.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTOH Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF | 6.24% | 6.57% | 6.81% | 6.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 6.79% | 6.97% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 5.58% | 4.54% | 5.21% | 6.06% | 6.45% | 5.57% | 5.37% | 6.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTOH and HYHG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYHG has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to GTOH (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTOH dropped -4.77% vs HYHG's -25.71%.
On 3-year performance, HYHG leads with 9.69% vs 7.86% for GTOH. On fees, GTOH is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, GTOH has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HYHG has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GTOH is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYHG.
HYHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.79%, compared with 6.24% for GTOH.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for GTOH and 0.50% for HYHG.
GTOH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTOH and HYHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer