GTO vs. FIBR
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR).
GTO and FIBR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GTO is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on Feb 10, 2016. FIBR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2015.
Performance
GTO vs. FIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GTO vs. FIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | -0.10% | 7.17% | 2.63% | 5.95% | -14.77% | -0.38% | 10.86% | 11.65% | -0.26% | 7.41% |
FIBR iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF | -0.11% | 8.32% | 6.04% | 8.22% | -13.57% | -1.00% | 3.31% | 10.03% | -0.93% | 3.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTO achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly higher than FIBR's -0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, GTO has outperformed FIBR with an annualized return of 3.02%, while FIBR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.49% annualized return.
GTO
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 4.30%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- 3.02%
FIBR
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 6.43%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTO vs. FIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FIBR's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GTO vs. FIBR — Risk / Return Rank
GTO
FIBR
GTO vs. FIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTO | FIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.67 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 2.40 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.31 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 2.25 | -0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.09 | 9.19 | -4.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTO | FIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.67 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.30 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.51 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.50 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between GTO and FIBR is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GTO vs. FIBR - Dividend Comparison
GTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than FIBR's 4.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | 4.78% | 4.70% | 4.42% | 4.05% | 3.47% | 1.93% | 4.04% | 2.97% | 5.25% | 2.81% | 2.57% | 0.00% |
FIBR iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF | 4.70% | 4.78% | 5.04% | 4.44% | 3.27% | 1.92% | 2.57% | 3.27% | 3.61% | 2.74% | 2.92% | 2.26% |
Drawdowns
GTO vs. FIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTO drawdown since its inception was -20.61%, which is greater than FIBR's maximum drawdown of -18.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTO and FIBR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTO | FIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.61% | -18.47% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -2.84% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.61% | -18.47% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.61% | -18.47% | -2.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -1.96% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -3.30% | -1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.69% | +0.28% |
Volatility
GTO vs. FIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) is 1.58%, while iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR) has a volatility of 1.91%. This indicates that GTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GTO | FIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 1.91% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.32% | 2.96% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04% | 3.87% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.69% | 5.59% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.57% | 4.93% | +0.64% |