GTMIX vs. SFNNX
Compare and contrast key facts about GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund (GTMIX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX).
GTMIX is managed by GMO. It was launched on Jul 28, 1998. SFNNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Apr 1, 2007.
Performance
GTMIX vs. SFNNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GTMIX vs. SFNNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTMIX GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund | 8.42% | 46.17% | 1.54% | 14.96% | -10.13% | 10.71% | 7.50% | 23.35% | -21.23% | 28.45% |
SFNNX Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund | 7.49% | 41.06% | 2.27% | 19.88% | -7.95% | 14.38% | 4.35% | 18.09% | -13.96% | 23.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTMIX achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly higher than SFNNX's 7.49% return. Over the past 10 years, GTMIX has underperformed SFNNX with an annualized return of 9.87%, while SFNNX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.98% annualized return.
GTMIX
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 6M
- 17.91%
- 1Y
- 41.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.29%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
SFNNX
- 1D
- 2.54%
- 1M
- -6.45%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- 39.13%
- 3Y*
- 20.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTMIX vs. SFNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTMIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SFNNX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GTMIX vs. SFNNX — Risk / Return Rank
GTMIX
SFNNX
GTMIX vs. SFNNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund (GTMIX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTMIX | SFNNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.67 | 2.40 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.40 | 3.03 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.47 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 3.47 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.76 | 13.20 | +3.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTMIX | SFNNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 2.40 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.80 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.64 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.25 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between GTMIX and SFNNX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GTMIX vs. SFNNX - Dividend Comparison
GTMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.69%, more than SFNNX's 4.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTMIX GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund | 20.69% | 22.43% | 5.94% | 0.36% | 5.44% | 16.55% | 2.25% | 4.13% | 7.25% | 2.96% | 4.05% | 3.26% |
SFNNX Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund | 4.76% | 5.11% | 3.61% | 3.26% | 2.92% | 3.81% | 2.42% | 3.69% | 3.51% | 2.70% | 3.21% | 2.92% |
Drawdowns
GTMIX vs. SFNNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTMIX drawdown since its inception was -58.31%, roughly equal to the maximum SFNNX drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTMIX and SFNNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTMIX | SFNNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.31% | -59.60% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.24% | -10.96% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.81% | -25.66% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.32% | -40.23% | -0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.51% | -7.73% | +3.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.75% | -12.06% | -0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 2.88% | -0.50% |
Volatility
GTMIX vs. SFNNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GMO Tax-Managed International Equities Fund (GTMIX) is 5.97%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that GTMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFNNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GTMIX | SFNNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 7.48% | -1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.56% | 10.99% | -1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 16.49% | -0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 15.46% | -0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 17.28% | -1.22% |