PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTEK vs. MSDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTEK vs. MSDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTEK achieves a 50.39% return, which is significantly higher than MSDD's -48.72% return.


GTEK

1D
0.40%
1M
2.09%
YTD
50.39%
6M
49.54%
1Y
69.25%
3Y*
34.53%
5Y*
10Y*

MSDD

1D
0.00%
1M
44.99%
YTD
-48.72%
6M
-44.83%
1Y
89.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTEK vs. MSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GTEK and MSDD is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025

-0.46

GTEK vs. MSDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GTEK
MSDD

Technology

75.2%
200.1%

Industrials

7.8%

-

Communication Services

4.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%

-

Basic Materials

3.4%

-

Real Estate

2.6%

-

Financial Services

1.3%

-

Healthcare

1.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

GTEK
75.2%
MSDD
200.1%

Industrials

GTEK
7.8%
MSDD

-

Communication Services

GTEK
4.0%
MSDD

-

Consumer Cyclical

GTEK
3.7%
MSDD

-

Basic Materials

GTEK
3.4%
MSDD

-

Real Estate

GTEK
2.6%
MSDD

-

Financial Services

GTEK
1.3%
MSDD

-

Healthcare

GTEK
1.2%
MSDD

-

Consumer Defensive

GTEK

-

MSDD

-

Energy

GTEK

-

MSDD

-

Utilities

GTEK

-

MSDD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTEK vs. MSDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTEK
GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

MSDD
MSDD Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTEK vs. MSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTEKMSDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.22

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.25

0.92

+5.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.24

1.81

+17.42

GTEK vs. MSDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTEK Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the MSDD Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTEK and MSDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTEK vs. MSDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTEK drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, smaller than the maximum MSDD drawdown of -84.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTEK and MSDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTEKMSDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.77%

-84.91%

+31.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-84.91%

+73.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.99%

-68.63%

+64.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.20%

-31.40%

+4.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

43.10%

-39.49%

Volatility

GTEK vs. MSDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) is 13.24%, while GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) has a volatility of 32.11%. This indicates that GTEK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTEKMSDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.24%

32.11%

-18.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.70%

124.37%

-99.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.51%

140.94%

-112.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.68%

138.59%

-109.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.68%

138.59%

-109.91%

GTEK vs. MSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTEK vs. MSDD - Dividend Comparison

Neither GTEK nor MSDD has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GTEK
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.26%0.03%
MSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTEK and MSDD have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSDD has higher volatility (32.11%) compared to GTEK (13.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTEK dropped -53.77% vs MSDD's -84.91%.

On 1-year performance, MSDD leads with 89.90% vs 69.25% for GTEK. On fees, GTEK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, GTEK has been the lower-risk option at 13.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSDD has performed better with a 89.90% return vs 69.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GTEK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSDD.

GTEK and MSDD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

GTEK is categorized as Technology Equities, while MSDD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GTEK and 1.50% for MSDD.

GTEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTEK and MSDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer