PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTEK vs. MSDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTEK vs. MSDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTEK achieves a 53.34% return, which is significantly higher than MSDD's -49.24% return.


GTEK

1D
-0.07%
1M
13.61%
YTD
53.34%
6M
54.05%
1Y
79.94%
3Y*
34.69%
5Y*
10Y*

MSDD

1D
-3.94%
1M
84.54%
YTD
-49.24%
6M
-28.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTEK vs. MSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GTEK and MSDD is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

-0.47

GTEK vs. MSDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GTEK
MSDD

Technology

76.3%
200.1%

Industrials

7.1%

-

Communication Services

3.6%

-

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%

-

Real Estate

2.6%

-

Healthcare

1.2%

-

Financial Services

0.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

GTEK
76.3%
MSDD
200.1%

Industrials

GTEK
7.1%
MSDD

-

Communication Services

GTEK
3.6%
MSDD

-

Basic Materials

GTEK
3.2%
MSDD

-

Consumer Cyclical

GTEK
2.9%
MSDD

-

Real Estate

GTEK
2.6%
MSDD

-

Healthcare

GTEK
1.2%
MSDD

-

Financial Services

GTEK
0.8%
MSDD

-

Consumer Defensive

GTEK

-

MSDD

-

Energy

GTEK

-

MSDD

-

Utilities

GTEK

-

MSDD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTEK vs. MSDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTEK
GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

MSDD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTEK vs. MSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTEKMSDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.44

GTEK vs. MSDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTEKMSDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.64

-0.32

Drawdowns

GTEK vs. MSDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTEK drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, smaller than the maximum MSDD drawdown of -84.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTEK and MSDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTEKMSDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.77%

-84.91%

+31.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-68.95%

+68.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.49%

-29.58%

+2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

Volatility

GTEK vs. MSDD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTEKMSDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.94%

141.35%

-115.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.28%

141.35%

-113.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.28%

141.35%

-113.07%

GTEK vs. MSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTEK vs. MSDD - Dividend Comparison

Neither GTEK nor MSDD has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GTEK
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.26%0.03%
MSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTEK and MSDD have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GTEK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GTEK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSDD.

GTEK and MSDD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

GTEK is categorized as Technology Equities, while MSDD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GTEK and 1.50% for MSDD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTEK and MSDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer