PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTEK vs. MOON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTEK vs. MOON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF (MOON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GTEK

1D
-3.92%
1M
6.91%
YTD
50.51%
6M
50.29%
1Y
74.39%
3Y*
34.34%
5Y*
10Y*

MOON

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTEK vs. MOON - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GTEK
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF
50.51%23.68%15.94%33.58%-46.73%-2.50%
MOON
Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%-8.56%9.85%-61.07%-19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GTEK and MOON is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021

0.60

The correlation between GTEK and MOON shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GTEK vs. MOON - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GTEK
MOON

Technology

75.2%
42.4%

Industrials

7.8%
7.5%

Communication Services

4.0%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
11.9%

Basic Materials

3.4%
1.2%

Real Estate

2.6%

-

Financial Services

1.3%
4.2%

Healthcare

1.2%
23.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

GTEK
75.2%
MOON
42.4%

Industrials

GTEK
7.8%
MOON
7.5%

Communication Services

GTEK
4.0%
MOON
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GTEK
3.7%
MOON
11.9%

Basic Materials

GTEK
3.4%
MOON
1.2%

Real Estate

GTEK
2.6%
MOON

-

Financial Services

GTEK
1.3%
MOON
4.2%

Healthcare

GTEK
1.2%
MOON
23.5%

Consumer Defensive

GTEK

-

MOON

-

Energy

GTEK

-

MOON

-

Utilities

GTEK

-

MOON

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTEK vs. MOON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTEK
GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

MOON

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTEK vs. MOON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF (MOON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTEKMOONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.78

GTEK vs. MOON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTEK vs. MOON - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTEKMOONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

Volatility

GTEK vs. MOON - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTEKMOONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.70%

GTEK vs. MOON - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MOON's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTEK vs. MOON - Dividend Comparison

Neither GTEK nor MOON has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GTEK
Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.26%0.03%0.00%
MOON
Direxion Moonshot Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%0.62%1.41%0.00%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTEK and MOON have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MOON is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MOON is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GTEK.

GTEK and MOON have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GTEK and 0.65% for MOON.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTEK and MOON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer