GTEK vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GTEK (Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTEK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. GTEK is actively managed, while CHPS is passively managed. Over the past year, GTEK returned 79.94% vs 211.40% for CHPS. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GTEK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

GTEK vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTEK achieves a 53.34% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 103.69% return.

GTEK

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 13.61%
• YTD: 53.34%
• 6M: 54.05%
• 1Y: 79.94%
• 3Y*: 34.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: 23.46%
• YTD: 103.69%
• 6M: 107.58%
• 1Y: 211.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTEK vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	53.34%	23.68%	15.94%	5.92%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	103.69%	58.47%	7.75%	10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GTEK and CHPS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023	0.82

The correlation between GTEK and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

GTEK vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GTEK	CHPS
Technology	76.3%	98.8%
Industrials	7.1%	0.4%
Communication Services	3.6%	-
Basic Materials	3.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	-
Real Estate	2.6%	-
Healthcare	1.2%	-
Financial Services	0.8%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.5%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GTEK vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTEK

GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 89
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 92

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTEK vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTEK	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	6.17	-3.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	5.85	-2.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.78	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.22	12.16	-4.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.44	47.22	-23.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GTEK vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTEK Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 6.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTEK and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTEK	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.10	6.17	-3.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	1.77	-1.44

Drawdowns

GTEK vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTEK drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTEK and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTEK	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.77%	-39.44%	-14.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.13%	-17.50%	+6.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-2.06%	+1.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.49%	-9.15%	-18.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	4.50%	-1.08%

Volatility

GTEK vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) is 9.28%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.07%. This indicates that GTEK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTEK	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.28%	14.07%	-4.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.75%	28.29%	-6.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.94%	34.50%	-8.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.28%	33.78%	-5.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.28%	33.78%	-5.50%

GTEK vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTEK vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

GTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.33%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%	0.00%
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.26%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTEK and CHPS in my portfolio?

GTEK and CHPS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTEK or CHPS?

CHPS has higher volatility (14.07%) compared to GTEK (9.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTEK dropped -53.77% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

Which ETF is better, GTEK or CHPS?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 211.40% vs 79.94% for GTEK. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GTEK has been the lower-risk option at 9.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GTEK or CHPS?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 211.40% return vs 79.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTEK or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GTEK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTEK or CHPS?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for GTEK.

What is the main difference between GTEK and CHPS?

GTEK is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GTEK and 0.15% for CHPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.17 vs 3.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.