GTDDX vs. VAFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) and Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A (VAFAX).
GTDDX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Jan 10, 1994. VAFAX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Jun 23, 2005.
Performance
GTDDX vs. VAFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GTDDX vs. VAFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTDDX Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd | 7.58% | 29.88% | -0.66% | 8.82% | -17.70% | -7.00% | 17.19% | 29.99% | -18.77% | 30.34% |
VAFAX Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A | -9.70% | 11.86% | 34.78% | 40.91% | -31.20% | 11.13% | 42.15% | 36.55% | -3.99% | 27.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTDDX achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly higher than VAFAX's -9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GTDDX has underperformed VAFAX with an annualized return of 7.33%, while VAFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.
GTDDX
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -10.00%
- YTD
- 7.58%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 36.68%
- 3Y*
- 11.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
VAFAX
- 1D
- 4.44%
- 1M
- -5.93%
- YTD
- -9.70%
- 6M
- -12.22%
- 1Y
- 14.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTDDX vs. VAFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTDDX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VAFAX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GTDDX vs. VAFAX — Risk / Return Rank
GTDDX
VAFAX
GTDDX vs. VAFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) and Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A (VAFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTDDX | VAFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 0.63 | +1.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.63 | 1.06 | +1.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.15 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 0.65 | +1.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.81 | 2.03 | +7.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTDDX | VAFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 0.63 | +1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.31 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.63 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.53 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between GTDDX and VAFAX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GTDDX vs. VAFAX - Dividend Comparison
GTDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.64%, more than VAFAX's 15.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTDDX Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd | 19.64% | 21.13% | 1.16% | 1.51% | 1.17% | 4.46% | 5.05% | 1.49% | 1.53% | 0.71% | 0.86% | 0.99% |
VAFAX Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A | 15.61% | 14.09% | 3.74% | 0.00% | 8.32% | 26.50% | 8.78% | 6.85% | 10.42% | 5.37% | 4.08% | 4.90% |
Drawdowns
GTDDX vs. VAFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTDDX drawdown since its inception was -62.89%, which is greater than VAFAX's maximum drawdown of -48.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTDDX and VAFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTDDX | VAFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.89% | -48.48% | -14.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -19.27% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.56% | -38.86% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.58% | -38.86% | -0.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.50% | -15.69% | +4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -8.16% | -10.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 6.14% | -2.60% |
Volatility
GTDDX vs. VAFAX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) has a higher volatility of 10.30% compared to Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A (VAFAX) at 8.31%. This indicates that GTDDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GTDDX | VAFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.30% | 8.31% | +1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.56% | 15.69% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.47% | 25.39% | -6.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 23.03% | -7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 22.23% | -5.61% |