PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTDDX vs. VAFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTDDX vs. VAFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) and Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A (VAFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTDDX achieves a 48.07% return, which is significantly higher than VAFAX's 8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, GTDDX has underperformed VAFAX with an annualized return of 10.32%, while VAFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.86% annualized return.


GTDDX

1D
-1.26%
1M
17.95%
YTD
48.07%
6M
52.83%
1Y
75.00%
3Y*
24.35%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*
10.32%

VAFAX

1D
-0.60%
1M
4.77%
YTD
8.97%
6M
7.79%
1Y
21.60%
3Y*
23.04%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
15.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTDDX vs. VAFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTDDX
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd
48.07%29.88%-0.66%8.82%-17.70%-7.00%17.19%29.99%-18.77%30.34%
VAFAX
Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A
8.97%11.86%34.78%40.91%-31.20%11.13%42.15%36.55%-3.99%27.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GTDDX and VAFAX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2005

0.64

The correlation between GTDDX and VAFAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTDDX vs. VAFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTDDX
GTDDX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GTDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GTDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

VAFAX
VAFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
VAFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VAFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTDDX vs. VAFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) and Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A (VAFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTDDXVAFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.21

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.35

1.17

+4.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.28

3.52

+17.75

GTDDX vs. VAFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTDDX Sharpe Ratio is 4.01, which is higher than the VAFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTDDX and VAFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTDDXVAFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.01

1.17

+2.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.46

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.71

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.57

-0.22

Drawdowns

GTDDX vs. VAFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTDDX drawdown since its inception was -62.89%, which is greater than VAFAX's maximum drawdown of -48.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTDDX and VAFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTDDXVAFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.89%

-48.48%

-14.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.49%

-19.27%

+4.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.08%

-27.24%

+11.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.56%

-38.86%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.58%

-38.86%

-0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-0.60%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.75%

-8.13%

-10.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

6.35%

-2.72%

Volatility

GTDDX vs. VAFAX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) has a higher volatility of 8.20% compared to Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A (VAFAX) at 5.02%. This indicates that GTDDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTDDXVAFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.20%

5.02%

+3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.79%

14.64%

+2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.34%

19.21%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.39%

23.05%

-6.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

22.31%

-5.40%

GTDDX vs. VAFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTDDX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VAFAX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTDDX vs. VAFAX - Dividend Comparison

GTDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.27%, more than VAFAX's 12.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTDDX
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd
14.27%21.13%1.16%1.51%1.17%4.46%5.05%1.49%1.53%0.71%0.86%0.99%
VAFAX
Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A
12.93%14.09%3.74%0.00%8.32%26.50%8.78%6.85%10.42%5.37%4.08%4.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTDDX and VAFAX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTDDX has higher volatility (8.20%) compared to VAFAX (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTDDX dropped -62.89% vs VAFAX's -48.48%.

GTDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.01 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTDDX and VAFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer