PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTCSX vs. HDPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTCSX vs. HDPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GTCSX) and Hodges Small Cap Fund (HDPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTCSX achieves a 9.76% return, which is significantly lower than HDPSX's 30.62% return. Over the past 10 years, GTCSX has underperformed HDPSX with an annualized return of 9.18%, while HDPSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.71% annualized return.


GTCSX

1D
-0.64%
1M
0.62%
YTD
9.76%
6M
9.23%
1Y
20.34%
3Y*
9.09%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
9.18%

HDPSX

1D
-0.34%
1M
4.69%
YTD
30.62%
6M
26.43%
1Y
50.89%
3Y*
34.09%
5Y*
16.76%
10Y*
15.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTCSX vs. HDPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTCSX
Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio
9.76%-1.95%8.50%16.93%-10.91%28.87%15.65%21.12%-16.17%15.80%
HDPSX
Hodges Small Cap Fund
30.62%3.07%62.98%14.88%-12.78%35.60%16.98%16.85%-16.35%9.34%

Correlation

The correlation between GTCSX and HDPSX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2007

0.92

The correlation between GTCSX and HDPSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTCSX vs. HDPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTCSX
GTCSX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GTCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GTCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

HDPSX
HDPSX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
HDPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
HDPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTCSX vs. HDPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GTCSX) and Hodges Small Cap Fund (HDPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTCSXHDPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.41

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

4.90

-3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.76

14.83

-9.08

GTCSX vs. HDPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the HDPSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTCSX and HDPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTCSXHDPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

2.44

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.62

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.57

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.44

-0.08

Drawdowns

GTCSX vs. HDPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTCSX drawdown since its inception was -59.45%, smaller than the maximum HDPSX drawdown of -65.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTCSX and HDPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTCSXHDPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.45%

-65.86%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-10.42%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.54%

-28.83%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.54%

-28.83%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.50%

-58.96%

+9.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-0.34%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.01%

-10.85%

-1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

3.43%

+0.08%

Volatility

GTCSX vs. HDPSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GTCSX) is 4.63%, while Hodges Small Cap Fund (HDPSX) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that GTCSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTCSXHDPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

6.42%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

14.93%

-2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.14%

21.00%

-2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.89%

27.00%

-6.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.35%

27.50%

-4.15%

GTCSX vs. HDPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTCSX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than HDPSX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTCSX vs. HDPSX - Dividend Comparison

GTCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.53%, more than HDPSX's 5.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTCSX
Glenmede Small Cap Equity Portfolio
7.53%8.24%4.29%8.45%12.65%4.43%0.14%0.23%19.39%10.74%1.94%1.11%
HDPSX
Hodges Small Cap Fund
5.85%7.64%44.97%5.01%6.46%19.53%0.00%8.25%4.66%14.53%0.32%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTCSX and HDPSX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDPSX has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to GTCSX (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTCSX dropped -59.45% vs HDPSX's -65.86%.

HDPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTCSX and HDPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer