GTCIX vs. PPYPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Glenmede Quantitative International Equity Portfolio (GTCIX) and PIMCO RAE International Fund (PPYPX).
GTCIX is managed by Glenmede. It was launched on Nov 16, 1988. PPYPX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 4, 2015.
Performance
GTCIX vs. PPYPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GTCIX vs. PPYPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTCIX Glenmede Quantitative International Equity Portfolio | 1.90% | 39.90% | 8.60% | 19.16% | -11.88% | 12.56% | 1.86% | 18.00% | -16.26% | 22.46% |
PPYPX PIMCO RAE International Fund | 8.42% | 31.34% | -1.15% | 18.13% | -8.73% | 10.68% | 2.05% | 16.43% | -15.49% | 24.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTCIX achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than PPYPX's 8.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GTCIX having a 8.69% annualized return and PPYPX not far ahead at 8.80%.
GTCIX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -9.46%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 30.44%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- 8.69%
PPYPX
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 31.25%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTCIX vs. PPYPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTCIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PPYPX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GTCIX vs. PPYPX — Risk / Return Rank
GTCIX
PPYPX
GTCIX vs. PPYPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative International Equity Portfolio (GTCIX) and PIMCO RAE International Fund (PPYPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTCIX | PPYPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.92 | 1.96 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 2.52 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.38 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 2.46 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.94 | 11.58 | -1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTCIX | PPYPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 1.96 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.46 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.46 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.45 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between GTCIX and PPYPX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GTCIX vs. PPYPX - Dividend Comparison
GTCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, less than PPYPX's 7.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTCIX Glenmede Quantitative International Equity Portfolio | 4.42% | 4.50% | 9.25% | 2.75% | 3.14% | 3.09% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 2.62% | 1.75% | 1.83% | 0.71% |
PPYPX PIMCO RAE International Fund | 7.17% | 7.78% | 6.57% | 10.09% | 7.20% | 27.06% | 2.23% | 4.20% | 5.96% | 2.53% | 2.41% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GTCIX vs. PPYPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTCIX drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than PPYPX's maximum drawdown of -42.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTCIX and PPYPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTCIX | PPYPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -42.48% | -21.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.77% | -10.21% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.23% | -35.65% | +9.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.50% | -42.48% | +2.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.46% | -6.12% | -3.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.17% | -10.28% | -2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 2.47% | +0.27% |
Volatility
GTCIX vs. PPYPX - Volatility Comparison
Glenmede Quantitative International Equity Portfolio (GTCIX) and PIMCO RAE International Fund (PPYPX) have volatilities of 5.13% and 4.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GTCIX | PPYPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 4.98% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.46% | 9.98% | -1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.92% | 15.30% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.39% | 19.59% | -6.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 19.07% | -3.73% |