PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSWO vs. VFV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSWO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GSWO is traded in USD, while VFV.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the VFV.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSWO achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly lower than VFV.TO's 11.28% return.


GSWO

1D
-2.69%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
8.59%
6M
9.20%
1Y
17.86%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
10Y*

VFV.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
3.15%
YTD
11.28%
6M
10.87%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSWO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GSWO
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF
8.59%7.90%
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
8.37%14.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GSWO and VFV.TO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSWO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSWO
GSWO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
GSWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GSWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VFV.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSWO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF (GSWO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSWOVFV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.58

GSWO vs. VFV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSWOVFV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

2.37

-1.43

Drawdowns

GSWO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSWO drawdown since its inception was -17.77%, which is greater than VFV.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSWO and VFV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSWOVFV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.77%

-8.89%

-8.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-0.26%

-2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-1.10%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

Volatility

GSWO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSWOVFV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.11%

11.75%

-0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.02%

11.75%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.02%

11.75%

+1.27%

GSWO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSWO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSWO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison

GSWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than VFV.TO's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GSWO
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Equity ETF
1.65%1.74%1.75%2.06%1.73%
VFV.TO
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF
0.85%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSWO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSWO.

GSWO is categorized as Global Equities, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. GSWO tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta World Low Vol Plus Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while VFV.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GSWO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSWO and VFV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer