GSTGX vs. FUMBX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GSTGX (Goldman Sachs Short Duration Government Fund) and FUMBX (Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund) are both Government Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, GSTGX returned 0.94%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for FUMBX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSTGX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FUMBX.

Performance

GSTGX vs. FUMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Short Duration Government Fund (GSTGX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSTGX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly higher than FUMBX's 0.09% return.

GSTGX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.07%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: 0.73%
• 1Y: 3.10%
• 3Y*: 3.53%
• 5Y*: 0.94%
• 10Y*: 1.36%

FUMBX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 0.09%
• 6M: 0.46%
• 1Y: 3.09%
• 3Y*: 4.00%
• 5Y*: 1.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSTGX vs. FUMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSTGX Goldman Sachs Short Duration Government Fund	0.24%	5.00%	3.16%	3.49%	-5.70%	-1.30%	3.94%	3.14%	1.39%	-0.18%
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund	0.09%	5.83%	3.25%	4.47%	-5.84%	-1.38%	4.22%	4.19%	1.47%	-0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GSTGX and FUMBX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017	0.78

The correlation between GSTGX and FUMBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GSTGX vs. FUMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSTGX

GSTGX Risk / Return Rank: 49
GSTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GSTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
GSTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
GSTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
GSTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FUMBX

FUMBX Risk / Return Rank: 33
FUMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FUMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FUMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FUMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FUMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSTGX vs. FUMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Short Duration Government Fund (GSTGX) and Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GSTGX	FUMBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.60	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	2.57	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.32	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	2.15	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.49	6.82	+2.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GSTGX vs. FUMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSTGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the FUMBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSTGX and FUMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GSTGX	FUMBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	1.60	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.44	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.37	0.72	+0.65

Drawdowns

GSTGX vs. FUMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSTGX drawdown since its inception was -8.73%, roughly equal to the maximum FUMBX drawdown of -8.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSTGX and FUMBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSTGX	FUMBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.73%	-8.83%	+0.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.27%	-1.54%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.33%	-1.57%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.47%	-8.60%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-8.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-0.87%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.75%	-1.86%	+1.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.35%	0.48%	-0.13%

Volatility

GSTGX vs. FUMBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Short Duration Government Fund (GSTGX) is 0.55%, while Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUMBX) has a volatility of 0.66%. This indicates that GSTGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSTGX	FUMBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.55%	0.66%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.33%	1.48%	-0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90%	2.06%	-0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.49%	2.92%	-0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.01%	2.49%	-0.48%

GSTGX vs. FUMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSTGX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMBX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSTGX vs. FUMBX - Dividend Comparison

GSTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than FUMBX's 3.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FUMBX Fidelity Short-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund	3.76%	3.51%	2.91%	1.64%	0.86%	1.15%	1.41%	1.88%	1.64%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%
GSTGX Goldman Sachs Short Duration Government Fund	3.39%	3.25%	2.66%	2.42%	1.12%	0.72%	1.53%	2.47%	2.40%	2.06%	1.73%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSTGX and FUMBX in my portfolio?

GSTGX and FUMBX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSTGX or FUMBX?

FUMBX has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to GSTGX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSTGX dropped -8.73% vs FUMBX's -8.83%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.