PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSSRX vs. GSIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSSRX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSSRX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than GSIMX's 6.45% return.


GSSRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.29%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
2.42%

GSIMX

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
6.45%
6M
8.00%
1Y
12.69%
3Y*
17.16%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSSRX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSSRX
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund
0.83%6.57%4.53%5.28%-6.06%-0.86%5.85%6.79%-0.02%1.61%
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
6.45%20.85%9.66%22.10%-11.06%12.50%15.77%27.64%-6.04%29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between GSSRX and GSIMX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSSRX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSSRX
GSSRX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GSSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GSSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIMX
GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSSRX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSSRXGSIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.23

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

1.56

+1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.08

5.22

+7.86

GSSRX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSSRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSSRX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSSRXGSIMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.27

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.63

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.82

+0.16

Drawdowns

GSSRX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSSRX drawdown since its inception was -9.03%, smaller than the maximum GSIMX drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSRX and GSIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSSRXGSIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.03%

-28.84%

+19.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-7.81%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.62%

-10.32%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.88%

-25.37%

+16.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-3.70%

+3.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.26%

-4.82%

+3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

2.33%

-1.97%

Volatility

GSSRX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) is 0.71%, while Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that GSSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSSRXGSIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

2.77%

-2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.77%

7.89%

-6.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

9.66%

-7.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.43%

14.36%

-11.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.41%

15.69%

-13.28%

GSSRX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSSRX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSSRX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

GSSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than GSIMX's 4.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.81%5.12%11.18%2.36%4.89%2.23%0.18%0.65%0.53%0.16%0.00%0.00%
GSSRX
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund
4.35%4.18%3.58%2.36%1.59%1.40%2.20%2.87%2.56%2.21%2.04%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSSRX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIMX has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to GSSRX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSRX dropped -9.03% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

GSSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSSRX and GSIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer