GSSRX vs. GSIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX).
GSSRX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Feb 29, 2012. GSIFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
GSSRX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSSRX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSRX Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund | -0.81% | 6.57% | 4.53% | 5.28% | -6.06% | -0.86% | 5.85% | 6.79% | -0.02% | 1.61% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | -5.52% | 25.51% | 0.33% | 15.44% | -17.69% | 16.23% | 22.89% | 27.68% | -14.85% | 25.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSSRX achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly higher than GSIFX's -5.52% return. Over the past 10 years, GSSRX has underperformed GSIFX with an annualized return of 2.34%, while GSIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.34% annualized return.
GSSRX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 2.34%
GSIFX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- -5.52%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 11.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSSRX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSSRX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSSRX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank
GSSRX
GSIFX
GSSRX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSSRX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | 0.60 | +1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.42 | 0.91 | +2.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.12 | +0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 0.81 | +1.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | 3.23 | +8.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSSRX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 0.60 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.32 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 | 0.48 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.30 | +0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSSRX and GSIFX is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GSSRX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison
GSSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than GSIFX's 2.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSSRX Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund | 3.95% | 4.18% | 3.58% | 2.36% | 1.59% | 1.40% | 2.20% | 2.87% | 2.56% | 2.21% | 2.04% | 2.15% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | 2.31% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 1.37% | 0.82% | 6.29% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 2.79% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
GSSRX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSSRX drawdown since its inception was -9.03%, smaller than the maximum GSIFX drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSRX and GSIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSSRX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.03% | -59.25% | +50.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.62% | -12.15% | +10.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.88% | -31.94% | +23.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.03% | -35.00% | +25.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -11.48% | +10.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -15.30% | +14.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | 3.06% | -2.69% |
Volatility
GSSRX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) is 0.84%, while Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that GSSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSSRX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 6.71% | -5.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.49% | 11.13% | -9.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15% | 16.87% | -14.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.38% | 16.71% | -14.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.39% | 17.32% | -14.93% |