PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSPCX vs. AUEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSPCX vs. AUEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity Fund Class C (GSPCX) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSPCX achieves a 10.73% return, which is significantly higher than AUEIX's 7.03% return. Over the past 10 years, GSPCX has outperformed AUEIX with an annualized return of 18.49%, while AUEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.02% annualized return.


GSPCX

1D
0.55%
1M
6.02%
YTD
10.73%
6M
10.35%
1Y
25.94%
3Y*
34.08%
5Y*
19.43%
10Y*
18.49%

AUEIX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.77%
YTD
7.03%
6M
6.47%
1Y
8.16%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
11.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSPCX vs. AUEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSPCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity Fund Class C
10.73%14.92%69.40%25.53%-20.38%23.47%21.83%31.34%-3.48%30.86%
AUEIX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund
7.03%6.95%13.85%9.49%-13.81%23.52%13.10%28.63%-0.27%22.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GSPCX and AUEIX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2012

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between GSPCX and AUEIX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSPCX vs. AUEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSPCX
GSPCX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GSPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GSPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

AUEIX
AUEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AUEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
AUEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSPCX vs. AUEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity Fund Class C (GSPCX) and AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSPCXAUEIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

1.05

+1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.96

1.55

+1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.18

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

1.40

+1.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.45

4.69

+7.76

GSPCX vs. AUEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSPCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the AUEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSPCX and AUEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSPCXAUEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.05

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.53

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.73

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.86

-0.48

Drawdowns

GSPCX vs. AUEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSPCX drawdown since its inception was -59.80%, which is greater than AUEIX's maximum drawdown of -30.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPCX and AUEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSPCXAUEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.80%

-30.82%

-28.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-5.91%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.72%

-10.27%

-26.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.72%

-22.08%

-14.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.72%

-30.82%

-5.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.15%

0.00%

-4.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.31%

-3.42%

-11.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

1.77%

+0.40%

Volatility

GSPCX vs. AUEIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity Fund Class C (GSPCX) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX) at 1.90%. This indicates that GSPCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSPCXAUEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

1.90%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.60%

5.60%

+4.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

7.91%

+4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.06%

12.99%

+28.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.12%

15.19%

+16.93%

GSPCX vs. AUEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSPCX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AUEIX's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSPCX vs. AUEIX - Dividend Comparison

GSPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.75%, more than AUEIX's 21.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUEIX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund
21.21%22.70%24.31%24.28%10.26%2.54%1.29%1.12%1.67%2.36%1.99%6.18%
GSPCX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity Fund Class C
31.75%35.15%60.78%0.59%17.48%20.15%6.00%6.15%79.73%11.58%1.81%11.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSPCX and AUEIX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSPCX has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to AUEIX (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSPCX dropped -59.80% vs AUEIX's -30.82%.

GSPCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSPCX and AUEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer