GSMCX vs. ATGAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GSMCX (Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund) and ATGAX (Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GSMCX charges 0.84%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for ATGAX.

Performance

GSMCX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund (GSMCX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GSMCX

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 5.26%
• YTD: 16.53%
• 6M: 15.31%
• 1Y: 27.01%
• 3Y*: 18.93%
• 5Y*: 11.43%
• 10Y*: 12.40%

ATGAX

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSMCX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GSMCX Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund	4.91%
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund	3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GSMCX and ATGAX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.84

Return for Risk

GSMCX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSMCX

GSMCX Risk / Return Rank: 55
GSMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
GSMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
GSMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GSMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GSMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

ATGAX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSMCX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund (GSMCX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSMCX	ATGAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.53	—	—

Drawdowns

GSMCX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSMCX drawdown since its inception was -54.35%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of -3.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSMCX and ATGAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSMCX	ATGAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.35%	-3.70%	-50.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	0.00%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.56%	-0.93%	-6.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GSMCX	ATGAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.89%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.75%	19.20%	-4.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.99%	19.20%	-1.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.54%	19.20%	+1.34%

GSMCX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSMCX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSMCX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison

GSMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.57%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GSMCX Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Fund	12.57%	14.65%	13.86%	4.92%	13.96%	17.06%	0.69%	3.42%	18.39%	15.77%	1.49%	13.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSMCX and ATGAX in my portfolio?

GSMCX and ATGAX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.