GSLC.L vs. VUAG.L
GSLC.L (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.)) and VUAG.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - GSLC.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while VUAG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSLC.L returned 12.75%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for VUAG.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSLC.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VUAG.L.
Performance
GSLC.L vs. VUAG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GSLC.L is traded in USD, while VUAG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUAG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSLC.L achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly lower than VUAG.L's 10.29% return.
GSLC.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 9.22%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 23.98%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 12.75%
- 10Y*
- —
VUAG.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 10.29%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 27.91%
- 3Y*
- 22.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
GSLC.L vs. VUAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLC.L Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) | 9.22% | 16.46% | 23.04% | 25.10% | -18.10% | 26.60% | 20.06% | 6.13% |
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 10.29% | 17.61% | 25.21% | 25.98% | -18.62% | 29.78% | 210.27% | 9.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSLC.L and VUAG.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, GSLC.L and VUAG.L have become more correlated (0.89) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.
GSLC.L vs. VUAG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSLC.L
VUAG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
-
Technology
GSLC.L
VUAG.L
Financial Services
GSLC.L
VUAG.L
Consumer Cyclical
GSLC.L
VUAG.L
Healthcare
GSLC.L
VUAG.L
Communication Services
GSLC.L
VUAG.L
Industrials
GSLC.L
VUAG.L
Consumer Defensive
GSLC.L
VUAG.L
Real Estate
GSLC.L
VUAG.L
Basic Materials
GSLC.L
VUAG.L
Utilities
GSLC.L
VUAG.L
Energy
GSLC.L
-
VUAG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSLC.L vs. VUAG.L — Risk / Return Rank
GSLC.L
VUAG.L
GSLC.L vs. VUAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GSLC.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSLC.L | VUAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.45 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 3.20 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | 13.80 | -4.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSLC.L | VUAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 2.49 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.88 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.91 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
GSLC.L vs. VUAG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSLC.L drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, smaller than the maximum VUAG.L drawdown of -33.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLC.L and VUAG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSLC.L | VUAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.20% | -33.59% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.07% | -8.69% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.98% | -18.69% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.89% | -25.18% | +1.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -0.53% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.61% | -4.93% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 2.02% | +0.45% |
Volatility
GSLC.L vs. VUAG.L - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GSLC.L) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) at 2.57%. This indicates that GSLC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSLC.L | VUAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 2.57% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | 8.01% | +1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.30% | 11.17% | +2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 15.65% | +3.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 36.49% | -15.20% |
GSLC.L vs. VUAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSLC.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VUAG.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSLC.L vs. VUAG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GSLC.L nor VUAG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLC.L Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 71.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSLC.L and VUAG.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUAG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for GSLC.L.
GSLC.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VUAG.L is S&P 500. GSLC.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while VUAG.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSLC.L and 0.07% for VUAG.L.
Find the right allocation for GSLC.L and VUAG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer