PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSLC.L vs. VEUR.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSLC.L vs. VEUR.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GSLC.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (VEUR.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GSLC.L is traded in USD, while VEUR.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VEUR.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSLC.L achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly higher than VEUR.MI's 5.87% return.


GSLC.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
5.52%
YTD
9.17%
6M
10.85%
1Y
22.99%
3Y*
20.82%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*

VEUR.MI

1D
0.52%
1M
2.33%
YTD
5.87%
6M
9.43%
1Y
18.16%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSLC.L vs. VEUR.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GSLC.L
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.)
9.17%16.46%23.04%25.10%-18.10%26.60%20.06%6.13%
VEUR.MI
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF
5.87%36.34%2.84%19.97%-15.16%15.29%7.05%9.68%

Correlation

The correlation between GSLC.L and VEUR.MI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.43

Over the past year, GSLC.L and VEUR.MI have become more correlated (0.68) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSLC.L vs. VEUR.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSLC.L
GSLC.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
GSLC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSLC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSLC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GSLC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSLC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

VEUR.MI
VEUR.MI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
VEUR.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEUR.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEUR.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
VEUR.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEUR.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSLC.L vs. VEUR.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GSLC.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (VEUR.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSLC.LVEUR.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

1.58

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.30

5.56

+3.74

GSLC.L vs. VEUR.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSLC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the VEUR.MI Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSLC.L and VEUR.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSLC.LVEUR.MIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.23

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.51

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.61

+0.57

Drawdowns

GSLC.L vs. VEUR.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSLC.L drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, smaller than the maximum VEUR.MI drawdown of -35.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLC.L and VEUR.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSLC.LVEUR.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.20%

-35.87%

+6.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-11.46%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.98%

-14.99%

-3.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.89%

-31.48%

+7.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-1.99%

+1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-6.01%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

3.26%

-0.79%

Volatility

GSLC.L vs. VEUR.MI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GSLC.L) is 4.00%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (VEUR.MI) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that GSLC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEUR.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSLC.LVEUR.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

4.95%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

12.24%

-2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.25%

14.78%

-1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.28%

17.69%

+1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.28%

18.86%

+2.42%

GSLC.L vs. VEUR.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSLC.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VEUR.MI's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSLC.L vs. VEUR.MI - Dividend Comparison

GSLC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEUR.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GSLC.L
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEUR.MI
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF
2.61%2.79%3.07%3.00%3.32%2.66%2.23%3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSLC.L and VEUR.MI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEUR.MI is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEUR.MI is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for GSLC.L.

GSLC.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VEUR.MI is Europe Equities. GSLC.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while VEUR.MI tracks FTSE Developed Europe Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSLC.L and 0.10% for VEUR.MI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSLC.L and VEUR.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer