GSLC.L vs. USDV.L
GSLC.L (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.)) and USDV.L (SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - GSLC.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while USDV.L tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSLC.L returned 12.74%/yr vs 5.66%/yr for USDV.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSLC.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for USDV.L.
Performance
GSLC.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GSLC.L is traded in USD, while USDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USDV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSLC.L achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly higher than USDV.L's 6.96% return.
GSLC.L
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 9.17%
- 6M
- 10.85%
- 1Y
- 22.99%
- 3Y*
- 20.82%
- 5Y*
- 12.74%
- 10Y*
- —
USDV.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 6.96%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- 1Y
- 12.93%
- 3Y*
- 9.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
GSLC.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLC.L Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) | 9.17% | 16.46% | 23.04% | 25.10% | -18.10% | 26.60% | 20.06% | 6.13% |
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 6.96% | 8.78% | 7.52% | 1.58% | -0.35% | 25.59% | 0.26% | 6.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSLC.L and USDV.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.33 |
GSLC.L vs. USDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSLC.L
USDV.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
-
Technology
GSLC.L
USDV.L
Financial Services
GSLC.L
USDV.L
Consumer Cyclical
GSLC.L
USDV.L
Healthcare
GSLC.L
USDV.L
Communication Services
GSLC.L
USDV.L
Industrials
GSLC.L
USDV.L
Consumer Defensive
GSLC.L
USDV.L
Real Estate
GSLC.L
USDV.L
Basic Materials
GSLC.L
USDV.L
Utilities
GSLC.L
USDV.L
Energy
GSLC.L
-
USDV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSLC.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank
GSLC.L
USDV.L
GSLC.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GSLC.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSLC.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.23 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 1.85 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.30 | 4.63 | +4.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSLC.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 1.34 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.41 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.74 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
GSLC.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSLC.L drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, smaller than the maximum USDV.L drawdown of -35.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLC.L and USDV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSLC.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.20% | -35.73% | +6.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.07% | -6.96% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.98% | -15.11% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.89% | -15.11% | -8.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -3.75% | +3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -3.39% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 2.79% | -0.32% |
Volatility
GSLC.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GSLC.L) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) at 2.40%. This indicates that GSLC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSLC.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 2.40% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | 6.87% | +3.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.25% | 9.63% | +3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.28% | 13.84% | +5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.28% | 15.76% | +5.52% |
GSLC.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSLC.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSLC.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison
GSLC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSLC.L Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 2.04% | 2.20% | 1.99% | 2.29% | 2.11% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.19% | 3.07% | 1.65% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSLC.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSLC.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSLC.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.
GSLC.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSLC.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.
Find the right allocation for GSLC.L and USDV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer