PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSLC.L vs. FEX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSLC.L vs. FEX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GSLC.L) and First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A USD (FEX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GSLC.L is traded in USD, while FEX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FEX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSLC.L achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly lower than FEX.L's 14.07% return.


GSLC.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
5.52%
YTD
9.17%
6M
10.85%
1Y
22.99%
3Y*
20.82%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*

FEX.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.39%
YTD
14.07%
6M
15.37%
1Y
28.90%
3Y*
20.45%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
12.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSLC.L vs. FEX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GSLC.L
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.)
9.17%16.46%23.04%25.10%-18.10%26.60%20.06%6.13%
FEX.L
First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A USD
14.07%15.44%16.70%14.07%-12.32%27.43%13.02%8.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GSLC.L and FEX.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.53

Over the past year, GSLC.L and FEX.L have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

GSLC.L vs. FEX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSLC.L
FEX.L

Technology

35.6%
21.0%

Financial Services

15.8%
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
8.3%

Healthcare

13.0%
8.9%

Communication Services

8.1%
3.4%

Industrials

6.7%
18.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.4%

Real Estate

2.0%
4.6%

Basic Materials

1.2%
3.4%

Utilities

0.1%
7.3%

Energy

-

6.0%

Technology

GSLC.L
35.6%
FEX.L
21.0%

Financial Services

GSLC.L
15.8%
FEX.L
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GSLC.L
13.5%
FEX.L
8.3%

Healthcare

GSLC.L
13.0%
FEX.L
8.9%

Communication Services

GSLC.L
8.1%
FEX.L
3.4%

Industrials

GSLC.L
6.7%
FEX.L
18.8%

Consumer Defensive

GSLC.L
4.0%
FEX.L
4.4%

Real Estate

GSLC.L
2.0%
FEX.L
4.6%

Basic Materials

GSLC.L
1.2%
FEX.L
3.4%

Utilities

GSLC.L
0.1%
FEX.L
7.3%

Energy

GSLC.L

-

FEX.L
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSLC.L vs. FEX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSLC.L
GSLC.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
GSLC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSLC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSLC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GSLC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSLC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FEX.L
FEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSLC.L vs. FEX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GSLC.L) and First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A USD (FEX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSLC.LFEX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.45

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

5.44

-3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.30

18.46

-9.17

GSLC.L vs. FEX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSLC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the FEX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSLC.L and FEX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSLC.LFEX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.51

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.68

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.74

+0.45

Drawdowns

GSLC.L vs. FEX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSLC.L drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, smaller than the maximum FEX.L drawdown of -38.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSLC.L and FEX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSLC.LFEX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.20%

-38.86%

+9.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

-5.29%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.98%

-20.12%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.89%

-21.55%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.03%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-4.46%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

1.56%

+0.91%

Volatility

GSLC.L vs. FEX.L - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GSLC.L) and First Trust US Large Cap Core AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A USD (FEX.L) have volatilities of 4.00% and 3.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSLC.LFEX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

3.94%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

7.96%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.25%

11.46%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.28%

15.93%

+3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.28%

17.25%

+4.03%

GSLC.L vs. FEX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSLC.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FEX.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSLC.L vs. FEX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GSLC.L nor FEX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GSLC.L and FEX.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GSLC.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GSLC.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FEX.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for GSLC.L and 0.75% for FEX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSLC.L and FEX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer