PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSK.L vs. SCHN.SW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GSK.L vs. SCHN.SW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK.L) and Schindler Holding AG (SCHN.SW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GSK.L is traded in GBp, while SCHN.SW is traded in CHF. To make them comparable, the SCHN.SW values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSK.L achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly higher than SCHN.SW's -8.54% return. Over the past 10 years, GSK.L has underperformed SCHN.SW with an annualized return of 6.03%, while SCHN.SW has yielded a comparatively higher 8.50% annualized return.


GSK.L

1D
1.10%
1M
6.15%
YTD
10.61%
6M
10.61%
1Y
32.87%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
6.03%

SCHN.SW

1D
0.38%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
-8.54%
6M
-7.07%
1Y
-8.30%
3Y*
14.47%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
8.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSK.L vs. SCHN.SW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSK.L
GlaxoSmithKline plc
10.61%41.46%-3.51%4.94%-25.94%26.66%-20.76%25.32%19.02%-10.82%
SCHN.SW
Schindler Holding AG
-8.54%23.67%19.78%27.48%-23.22%1.32%8.57%24.92%-7.13%19.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GSK.L and SCHN.SW is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2007

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSK.L vs. SCHN.SW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSK.L
GSK.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GSK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GSK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHN.SW
SCHN.SW Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SCHN.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHN.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHN.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHN.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHN.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSK.L vs. SCHN.SW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK.L) and Schindler Holding AG (SCHN.SW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSK.LSCHN.SWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.94

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

-0.53

+2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

-1.09

+5.66

GSK.L vs. SCHN.SW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSK.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the SCHN.SW Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSK.L and SCHN.SW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSK.L vs. SCHN.SW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSK.L drawdown since its inception was -42.39%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHN.SW drawdown of -41.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSK.L and SCHN.SW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSK.LSCHN.SWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.39%

-41.70%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.35%

-15.95%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.42%

-16.82%

-10.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.39%

-41.70%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.39%

-41.70%

-0.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.02%

-14.70%

+3.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.78%

-9.08%

-3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.93%

7.64%

-0.71%

Volatility

GSK.L vs. SCHN.SW - Volatility Comparison

GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK.L) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Schindler Holding AG (SCHN.SW) at 5.35%. This indicates that GSK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHN.SW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSK.LSCHN.SWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

5.35%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.09%

16.65%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.04%

19.57%

+5.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.68%

22.50%

+1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

21.77%

+0.32%

Dividends

GSK.L vs. SCHN.SW - Dividend Comparison

GSK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than SCHN.SW's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSK.L
GlaxoSmithKline plc
3.38%3.51%4.53%3.84%5.30%4.93%5.90%4.45%5.31%5.99%4.88%5.77%
SCHN.SW
Schindler Holding AG
2.71%2.13%2.02%2.01%2.40%1.64%1.68%1.69%2.10%0.91%1.52%0.59%

Financials

GSK.L vs. SCHN.SW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GlaxoSmithKline plc and Schindler Holding AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. GSK.L values in GBP, SCHN.SW values in CHF

Frequently Asked Questions


GSK.L and SCHN.SW have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSK.L and SCHN.SW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer