PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIYX vs. GGSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIYX vs. GGSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX) and Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIYX achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly lower than GGSIX's 10.48% return.


GSIYX

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
6.46%
6M
7.98%
1Y
12.72%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*

GGSIX

1D
0.31%
1M
4.93%
YTD
10.48%
6M
11.32%
1Y
25.82%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
10.29%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIYX vs. GGSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSIYX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6
6.46%20.89%9.69%22.07%-10.99%12.47%15.86%27.59%-6.02%29.91%
GGSIX
Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio
10.48%19.29%19.26%17.83%-16.86%17.04%14.34%24.92%-10.65%20.64%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIYX and GGSIX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between GSIYX and GGSIX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIYX vs. GGSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIYX
GSIYX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GSIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

GGSIX
GGSIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GGSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GGSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIYX vs. GGSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX) and Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSIYXGGSIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

2.42

-1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.78

3.35

-1.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

3.03

-1.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.23

13.48

-8.25

GSIYX vs. GGSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the GGSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIYX and GGSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSIYXGGSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.42

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.77

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.47

+0.35

Drawdowns

GSIYX vs. GGSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIYX drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, smaller than the maximum GGSIX drawdown of -52.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIYX and GGSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIYXGGSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-52.85%

+24.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

-8.71%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.30%

-14.78%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

-26.74%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.71%

0.00%

-3.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-9.20%

+4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

1.95%

+0.38%

Volatility

GSIYX vs. GGSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX) is 2.77%, while Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that GSIYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIYXGGSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

3.21%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

8.69%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.69%

10.93%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

13.43%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.70%

14.33%

+1.37%

GSIYX vs. GGSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIYX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GGSIX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSIYX vs. GGSIX - Dividend Comparison

GSIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than GGSIX's 10.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGSIX
Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio
10.75%11.87%12.21%1.73%5.76%6.57%3.47%5.77%3.02%2.77%1.35%2.03%
GSIYX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6
4.83%5.14%11.21%2.38%4.91%2.25%0.19%0.67%0.55%0.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIYX and GGSIX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GGSIX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to GSIYX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIYX dropped -28.79% vs GGSIX's -52.85%.

GGSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIYX and GGSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer