GSINX vs. GMSAX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

GSINX (Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund) and GMSAX (Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - GSINX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GMSAX is a Systematic Trend fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 5 years, GSINX returned 9.35%/yr vs 3.40%/yr for GMSAX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GSINX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for GMSAX.

Performance

GSINX vs. GMSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) and Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (GMSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GSINX having a 6.21% return and GMSAX slightly lower at 5.94%.

GSINX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 1.80%
• 6M: 5.08%
• YTD: 6.21%
• 1Y: 11.64%
• 3Y*: 15.15%
• 5Y*: 9.35%
• 10Y*: —

GMSAX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.21%
• 6M: 3.73%
• YTD: 5.94%
• 1Y: 15.09%
• 3Y*: -0.90%
• 5Y*: 3.40%
• 10Y*: 2.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSINX vs. GMSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GSINX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	6.21%	20.76%	9.53%	21.93%	-11.14%	12.35%	15.64%	27.41%	-6.14%	29.66%
GMSAX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A	5.94%	0.22%	-5.31%	-4.18%	20.08%	4.68%	6.64%	2.29%	-2.37%	2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GSINX and GMSAX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.19

Return for Risk

GSINX vs. GMSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSINX

GSINX Risk / Return Rank: 22
GSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
GSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
GSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
GSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
GSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

GMSAX

GMSAX Risk / Return Rank: 68
GMSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
GMSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
GMSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
GMSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
GMSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSINX vs. GMSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) and Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (GMSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GSINX	GMSAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	1.87	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	2.61	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.34	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	3.22	-1.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.03	9.35	-5.32

GSINX vs. GMSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the GMSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSINX and GMSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GSINX vs. GMSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSINX drawdown since its inception was -28.80%, which is greater than GMSAX's maximum drawdown of -23.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSINX and GMSAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GSINX	GMSAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.80%	-23.58%	-5.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	-4.81%	-2.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.32%	-22.56%	+12.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.46%	-23.58%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.88%	-8.02%	+4.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.85%	-7.26%	+2.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	1.65%	+1.16%

Volatility

GSINX vs. GMSAX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) and Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (GMSAX) have volatilities of 3.07% and 3.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GSINX	GMSAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.07%	3.20%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.41%	6.64%	+1.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.96%	8.27%	+1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.32%	10.45%	+3.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.64%	9.10%	+6.54%

GSINX vs. GMSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSINX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than GMSAX's 1.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

GSINX vs. GMSAX - Dividend Comparison

GSINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, while GMSAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GMSAX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	20.24%	7.31%	1.24%	6.90%	0.16%	0.49%	0.00%	3.88%
GSINX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	4.73%	5.03%	11.11%	2.27%	4.79%	2.13%	0.08%	0.57%	0.43%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GSINX and GMSAX in my portfolio?

GSINX and GMSAX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GSINX or GMSAX?

GMSAX has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to GSINX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSINX dropped -28.80% vs GMSAX's -23.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.