PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSINX vs. FAOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSINX vs. FAOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GSINX

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
6.39%
6M
7.92%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*

FAOAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
-1.81%
3Y*
8.51%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
7.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSINX vs. FAOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSINX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
6.39%20.76%9.53%21.93%-11.14%12.35%15.64%27.41%-6.14%29.66%
FAOAX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A
0.00%14.93%4.63%20.01%-24.61%18.90%14.71%27.39%-15.10%29.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GSINX and FAOAX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between GSINX and FAOAX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSINX vs. FAOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSINX
GSINX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FAOAX
FAOAX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FAOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FAOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSINX vs. FAOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSINXFAOAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.95

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

-0.37

+1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.17

-0.63

+5.80

GSINX vs. FAOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the FAOAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSINX and FAOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSINXFAOAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

-0.29

+1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.21

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.30

+0.51

Drawdowns

GSINX vs. FAOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSINX drawdown since its inception was -28.80%, smaller than the maximum FAOAX drawdown of -60.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSINX and FAOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSINXFAOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.80%

-60.03%

+31.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-7.29%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.32%

-13.99%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

-36.50%

+11.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.72%

-5.87%

+2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-14.56%

+9.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

3.98%

-1.65%

Volatility

GSINX vs. FAOAX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSINX) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A (FAOAX) at 0.00%. This indicates that GSINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSINXFAOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

0.00%

+2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

4.08%

+3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.68%

9.18%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.37%

16.72%

-2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

16.69%

-1.00%

GSINX vs. FAOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSINX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOAX's 1.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSINX vs. FAOAX - Dividend Comparison

GSINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, less than FAOAX's 8.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAOAX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class A
8.54%8.54%1.33%0.74%0.38%2.12%0.00%1.37%4.64%3.64%1.75%0.38%
GSINX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.73%5.03%11.11%2.27%4.79%2.13%0.08%0.57%0.43%0.12%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSINX and FAOAX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSINX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to FAOAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSINX dropped -28.80% vs FAOAX's -60.03%.

GSINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSINX and FAOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer