PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIMX vs. GSDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIMX vs. GSDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) and Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Debt Fund (GSDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIMX achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly higher than GSDIX's 3.14% return.


GSIMX

1D
-0.75%
1M
-1.66%
6M
5.20%
YTD
5.38%
1Y
10.38%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*

GSDIX

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.03%
6M
2.75%
YTD
3.14%
1Y
12.28%
3Y*
10.89%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
2.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIMX vs. GSDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
5.38%20.85%9.66%22.10%-11.06%12.50%15.77%27.64%-6.04%29.92%
GSDIX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Debt Fund
3.14%14.46%5.88%12.61%-18.92%-3.05%7.60%13.83%-7.49%9.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIMX and GSDIX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.29

The correlation between GSIMX and GSDIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIMX vs. GSDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIMX
GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

GSDIX
GSDIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GSDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GSDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIMX vs. GSDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) and Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Debt Fund (GSDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSIMXGSDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.52

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

2.72

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.58

12.16

-8.58

GSIMX vs. GSDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the GSDIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIMX and GSDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSIMX vs. GSDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIMX drawdown since its inception was -28.84%, smaller than the maximum GSDIX drawdown of -34.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIMX and GSDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIMXGSDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.84%

-34.56%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

-4.47%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.32%

-6.30%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

-31.65%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.67%

-0.50%

-4.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-4.65%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

1.00%

+1.75%

Volatility

GSIMX vs. GSDIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Debt Fund (GSDIX) at 1.13%. This indicates that GSIMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIMXGSDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

1.13%

+2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.45%

3.99%

+4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.97%

4.74%

+5.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.33%

7.30%

+7.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.65%

7.26%

+8.39%

GSIMX vs. GSDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIMX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than GSDIX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSIMX vs. GSDIX - Dividend Comparison

GSIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than GSDIX's 5.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSDIX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Debt Fund
5.45%5.62%4.66%4.83%9.31%4.00%3.69%4.41%4.78%4.87%5.25%5.34%
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.86%5.12%11.18%2.36%4.89%2.23%0.18%0.65%0.53%0.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIMX and GSDIX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIMX has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to GSDIX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIMX dropped -28.84% vs GSDIX's -34.56%.

GSDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIMX and GSDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer