GSIMX vs. FIGCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) and Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C (FIGCX).
GSIMX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 15, 2016. FIGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 2007.
Performance
GSIMX vs. FIGCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSIMX vs. FIGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund | 3.78% | 20.85% | 9.66% | 22.10% | -11.06% | 12.50% | 15.77% | 27.64% | -6.04% | 29.92% |
FIGCX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C | -6.06% | 16.70% | 4.24% | 19.59% | -24.00% | 14.19% | 15.75% | 32.65% | -12.46% | 28.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIMX achieves a 3.78% return, which is significantly higher than FIGCX's -6.06% return.
GSIMX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- 15.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- —
FIGCX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -13.51%
- YTD
- -6.06%
- 6M
- -6.06%
- 1Y
- 7.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSIMX vs. FIGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIMX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than FIGCX's 2.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSIMX vs. FIGCX — Risk / Return Rank
GSIMX
FIGCX
GSIMX vs. FIGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) and Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C (FIGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSIMX | FIGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 0.38 | +0.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 0.66 | +1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.09 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 0.42 | +1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 1.68 | +5.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSIMX | FIGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 0.38 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.20 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.22 | +0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSIMX and FIGCX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSIMX vs. FIGCX - Dividend Comparison
GSIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than FIGCX's 3.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund | 4.93% | 5.12% | 11.18% | 2.36% | 4.89% | 2.23% | 0.18% | 0.65% | 0.53% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIGCX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C | 3.12% | 2.93% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 1.52% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 0.07% |
Drawdowns
GSIMX vs. FIGCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIMX drawdown since its inception was -28.84%, smaller than the maximum FIGCX drawdown of -56.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIMX and FIGCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSIMX | FIGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.84% | -56.53% | +27.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.75% | -14.03% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.37% | -35.58% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.12% | -14.03% | +7.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -11.37% | +6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 3.54% | -1.39% |
Volatility
GSIMX vs. FIGCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) is 4.78%, while Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C (FIGCX) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that GSIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSIMX | FIGCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.78% | 8.00% | -3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.35% | 12.67% | -5.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.47% | 19.00% | -6.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 17.55% | -3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 17.53% | -1.76% |