GSGDX vs. VICBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX).
GSGDX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Nov 3, 2003. VICBX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Nov 19, 2009.
Performance
GSGDX vs. VICBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSGDX vs. VICBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSGDX Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund | -1.55% | 8.23% | 1.93% | 8.81% | -17.33% | -0.97% | 10.12% | 16.83% | -2.55% | 6.49% |
VICBX Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares | -0.91% | 9.37% | 3.67% | 8.87% | -14.06% | -1.50% | 9.57% | 15.96% | -1.72% | 5.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSGDX achieves a -1.55% return, which is significantly lower than VICBX's -0.91% return. Over the past 10 years, GSGDX has underperformed VICBX with an annualized return of 2.78%, while VICBX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.28% annualized return.
GSGDX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- -1.55%
- 6M
- -0.62%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- 0.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
VICBX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.53%
- 10Y*
- 3.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSGDX vs. VICBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSGDX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VICBX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSGDX vs. VICBX — Risk / Return Rank
GSGDX
VICBX
GSGDX vs. VICBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSGDX | VICBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.32 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 1.87 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.24 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 2.04 | -0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 7.57 | -3.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSGDX | VICBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.32 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.25 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.62 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.87 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSGDX and VICBX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSGDX vs. VICBX - Dividend Comparison
GSGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than VICBX's 4.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSGDX Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund | 4.46% | 4.75% | 3.94% | 3.52% | 2.74% | 5.10% | 4.18% | 5.89% | 3.56% | 3.19% | 3.38% | 3.76% |
VICBX Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares | 4.34% | 4.61% | 4.79% | 3.72% | 3.02% | 2.82% | 2.79% | 5.01% | 3.64% | 3.23% | 3.32% | 3.39% |
Drawdowns
GSGDX vs. VICBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSGDX drawdown since its inception was -23.48%, which is greater than VICBX's maximum drawdown of -20.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGDX and VICBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSGDX | VICBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.48% | -20.55% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.59% | -3.07% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.48% | -20.55% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.48% | -20.55% | -2.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -2.41% | -1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.89% | -3.16% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 0.83% | +0.25% |
Volatility
GSGDX vs. VICBX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) has a higher volatility of 1.92% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX) at 1.78%. This indicates that GSGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VICBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSGDX | VICBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.92% | 1.78% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 2.64% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.05% | 4.38% | +0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.82% | 6.14% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.38% | 5.33% | +1.05% |