PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSGDX vs. VICBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSGDX vs. VICBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSGDX achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly higher than VICBX's 0.39% return. Over the past 10 years, GSGDX has underperformed VICBX with an annualized return of 2.79%, while VICBX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.21% annualized return.


GSGDX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.56%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
2.79%

VICBX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.39%
6M
0.50%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
6.25%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
3.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSGDX vs. VICBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSGDX
Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund
0.53%8.23%1.93%8.81%-17.33%-0.97%10.12%16.83%-2.55%6.49%
VICBX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.39%9.37%3.67%8.87%-14.06%-1.50%9.57%15.96%-1.72%5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between GSGDX and VICBX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009

0.90

The correlation between GSGDX and VICBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSGDX vs. VICBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSGDX
GSGDX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GSGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GSGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

VICBX
VICBX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VICBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VICBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VICBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VICBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
VICBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSGDX vs. VICBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSGDXVICBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

1.61

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.07

2.37

-0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.22

-0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.99

7.49

-0.50

GSGDX vs. VICBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSGDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the VICBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSGDX and VICBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSGDXVICBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.61

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.22

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.60

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.88

-0.22

Drawdowns

GSGDX vs. VICBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSGDX drawdown since its inception was -23.48%, which is greater than VICBX's maximum drawdown of -20.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGDX and VICBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSGDXVICBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.48%

-20.55%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-2.95%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.98%

-5.98%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.48%

-20.55%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.48%

-20.55%

-2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-1.14%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-3.14%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

0.87%

+0.16%

Volatility

GSGDX vs. VICBX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) has a higher volatility of 1.58% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VICBX) at 1.39%. This indicates that GSGDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VICBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSGDXVICBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

1.39%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.38%

2.89%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.51%

3.92%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.85%

6.16%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.41%

5.34%

+1.07%

GSGDX vs. VICBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSGDX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VICBX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSGDX vs. VICBX - Dividend Comparison

GSGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, which matches VICBX's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSGDX
Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund
4.83%4.75%3.94%3.52%2.74%5.10%4.18%5.89%3.56%3.19%3.38%3.76%
VICBX
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.79%4.61%4.79%3.72%3.02%2.82%2.79%5.01%3.64%3.23%3.32%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, GSGDX and VICBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GSGDX has higher volatility (1.58%) compared to VICBX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSGDX dropped -23.48% vs VICBX's -20.55%.

VICBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSGDX and VICBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer