PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSGDX vs. GSIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSGDX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSGDX achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than GSIFX's 6.30% return. Over the past 10 years, GSGDX has underperformed GSIFX with an annualized return of 2.79%, while GSIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.36% annualized return.


GSGDX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.56%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
2.79%

GSIFX

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.71%
YTD
6.30%
6M
8.80%
1Y
12.85%
3Y*
11.38%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
9.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSGDX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSGDX
Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund
0.53%8.23%1.93%8.81%-17.33%-0.97%10.12%16.83%-2.55%6.49%
GSIFX
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A
6.30%25.51%0.33%15.44%-17.69%16.23%22.89%27.68%-14.85%25.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GSGDX and GSIFX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2004

-0.02

The correlation between GSGDX and GSIFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSGDX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSGDX
GSGDX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
GSGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GSGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIFX
GSIFX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GSIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSGDX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSGDXGSIFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

0.90

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.07

1.34

+0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.16

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.20

+0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.99

4.58

+2.42

GSGDX vs. GSIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSGDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the GSIFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSGDX and GSIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSGDXGSIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

0.90

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.36

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.54

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.32

+0.34

Drawdowns

GSGDX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSGDX drawdown since its inception was -23.48%, smaller than the maximum GSIFX drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGDX and GSIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSGDXGSIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.48%

-59.25%

+35.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.52%

-12.15%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.98%

-13.83%

+6.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.48%

-31.94%

+8.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.48%

-35.00%

+11.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-0.64%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-15.23%

+11.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

3.18%

-2.15%

Volatility

GSGDX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) is 1.58%, while Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that GSGDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSGDXGSIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

4.92%

-3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.38%

12.42%

-9.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.51%

15.48%

-10.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.85%

16.92%

-10.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.41%

17.40%

-10.99%

GSGDX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSGDX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSGDX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison

GSGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than GSIFX's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSGDX
Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund
4.83%4.75%3.94%3.52%2.74%5.10%4.18%5.89%3.56%3.19%3.38%3.76%
GSIFX
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A
2.05%2.18%2.30%1.37%0.82%6.29%0.00%1.67%1.45%1.25%2.79%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSGDX and GSIFX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIFX has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to GSGDX (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSGDX dropped -23.48% vs GSIFX's -59.25%.

GSGDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSGDX and GSIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer