GSGDX vs. GSIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX).
GSGDX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Nov 3, 2003. GSIFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
GSGDX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSGDX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSGDX Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund | -1.55% | 8.23% | 1.93% | 8.81% | -17.33% | -0.97% | 10.12% | 16.83% | -2.55% | 6.49% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | -5.52% | 25.51% | 0.33% | 15.44% | -17.69% | 16.23% | 22.89% | 27.68% | -14.85% | 25.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSGDX achieves a -1.55% return, which is significantly higher than GSIFX's -5.52% return. Over the past 10 years, GSGDX has underperformed GSIFX with an annualized return of 2.78%, while GSIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.34% annualized return.
GSGDX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- -1.55%
- 6M
- -0.62%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- 0.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.78%
GSIFX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- -5.52%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 11.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSGDX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSGDX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSGDX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank
GSGDX
GSIFX
GSGDX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSGDX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.60 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 0.91 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.12 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 0.81 | +0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 3.23 | +1.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSGDX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.60 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.32 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.48 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.30 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSGDX and GSIFX is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
GSGDX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison
GSGDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than GSIFX's 2.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSGDX Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund | 4.46% | 4.75% | 3.94% | 3.52% | 2.74% | 5.10% | 4.18% | 5.89% | 3.56% | 3.19% | 3.38% | 3.76% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | 2.31% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 1.37% | 0.82% | 6.29% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 2.79% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
GSGDX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSGDX drawdown since its inception was -23.48%, smaller than the maximum GSIFX drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSGDX and GSIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSGDX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.48% | -59.25% | +35.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.59% | -12.15% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.48% | -31.94% | +8.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.48% | -35.00% | +11.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -11.48% | +7.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.89% | -15.30% | +11.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 3.06% | -1.98% |
Volatility
GSGDX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) is 1.92%, while Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that GSGDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSGDX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.92% | 6.71% | -4.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | 11.13% | -8.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.05% | 16.87% | -11.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.82% | 16.71% | -9.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.38% | 17.32% | -10.94% |