GSG vs. XAAG.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (XAAG.DE).
GSG and XAAG.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 2006. XAAG.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture and Livestock. It was launched on May 22, 2017. Both GSG and XAAG.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GSG vs. XAAG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSG vs. XAAG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 38.38% | 5.93% | 8.52% | -5.51% | 24.08% | 38.77% | -23.94% | 15.62% | -13.88% | 13.13% |
XAAG.DE Invesco Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc | 22.71% | 26.58% | 8.28% | -12.07% | 16.55% | 28.74% | -11.59% | 10.61% | -9.58% | 11.92% |
Different Trading Currencies
GSG is traded in USD, while XAAG.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XAAG.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSG achieves a 38.38% return, which is significantly higher than XAAG.DE's 22.71% return.
GSG
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 18.45%
- YTD
- 38.38%
- 6M
- 39.22%
- 1Y
- 40.14%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 17.68%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
XAAG.DE
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- YTD
- 22.71%
- 6M
- 36.98%
- 1Y
- 38.51%
- 3Y*
- 17.67%
- 5Y*
- 15.72%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSG vs. XAAG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XAAG.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSG vs. XAAG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GSG
XAAG.DE
GSG vs. XAAG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (XAAG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSG | XAAG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 1.73 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.58 | 2.21 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 3.69 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.40 | 8.48 | +0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSG | XAAG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.73 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.76 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.50 | -0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSG and XAAG.DE is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GSG vs. XAAG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GSG nor XAAG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GSG vs. XAAG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSG drawdown since its inception was -89.62%, which is greater than XAAG.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSG and XAAG.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSG | XAAG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.62% | -33.85% | -55.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -14.18% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.12% | -33.85% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.22% | -2.33% | -55.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.77% | -14.09% | -49.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.27% | 5.36% | -1.09% |
Volatility
GSG vs. XAAG.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a higher volatility of 11.23% compared to Invesco Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (XAAG.DE) at 8.74%. This indicates that GSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAAG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSG | XAAG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.23% | 8.74% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.29% | 17.54% | -1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.14% | 22.19% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 20.46% | +1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 18.68% | +3.09% |