GSG vs. PHPP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals (PHPP.L).
GSG and PHPP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 2006. PHPP.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Precious Metals Basket. It was launched on Apr 24, 2007. Both GSG and PHPP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GSG vs. PHPP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSG vs. PHPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 39.85% | 5.93% | 8.52% | -5.51% | 24.08% | 38.77% | -23.94% | 15.62% | -13.88% | 3.89% |
PHPP.L WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals | 4.05% | 85.47% | 15.31% | -3.73% | -0.29% | -11.08% | 26.04% | 27.32% | -0.53% | 15.41% |
Different Trading Currencies
GSG is traded in USD, while PHPP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PHPP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSG achieves a 39.85% return, which is significantly higher than PHPP.L's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, GSG has underperformed PHPP.L with an annualized return of 9.09%, while PHPP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.46% annualized return.
GSG
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 24.23%
- YTD
- 39.85%
- 6M
- 40.40%
- 1Y
- 41.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
PHPP.L
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- -15.47%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 28.41%
- 1Y
- 64.07%
- 3Y*
- 29.40%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSG vs. PHPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PHPP.L's 0.44% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSG vs. PHPP.L — Risk / Return Rank
GSG
PHPP.L
GSG vs. PHPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals (PHPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSG | PHPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 1.93 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 2.32 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.34 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 2.37 | +1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 8.51 | +1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSG | PHPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.93 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.61 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.65 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.38 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSG and PHPP.L is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GSG vs. PHPP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GSG nor PHPP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GSG vs. PHPP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSG drawdown since its inception was -89.62%, which is greater than PHPP.L's maximum drawdown of -52.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSG and PHPP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSG | PHPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.62% | -49.43% | -40.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -24.37% | +12.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.12% | -26.89% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.64% | -26.89% | -30.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.78% | -18.87% | -38.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.77% | -18.70% | -45.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.27% | 6.55% | -2.28% |
Volatility
GSG vs. PHPP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) is 11.08%, while WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals (PHPP.L) has a volatility of 12.69%. This indicates that GSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSG | PHPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.08% | 12.69% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.24% | 30.33% | -14.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.16% | 33.01% | -11.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 22.94% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 20.63% | +1.15% |