GSG vs. PBDC
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC).
GSG and PBDC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 2006. PBDC is an actively managed fund by Putnam. It was launched on Sep 29, 2022.
Performance
GSG vs. PBDC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSG vs. PBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 38.38% | 5.93% | 8.52% | -5.51% | 3.16% |
PBDC Putnam BDC Income ETF | -11.37% | -1.77% | 19.43% | 30.52% | 10.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSG achieves a 38.38% return, which is significantly higher than PBDC's -11.37% return.
GSG
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 18.45%
- YTD
- 38.38%
- 6M
- 39.22%
- 1Y
- 40.14%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 17.68%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
PBDC
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- -11.37%
- 6M
- -8.48%
- 1Y
- -14.06%
- 3Y*
- 8.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSG vs. PBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PBDC's 6.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSG vs. PBDC — Risk / Return Rank
GSG
PBDC
GSG vs. PBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSG | PBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | -0.65 | +2.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.58 | -0.79 | +3.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.90 | +0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | -0.67 | +4.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.40 | -1.42 | +10.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSG | PBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | -0.65 | +2.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.74 | -0.84 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSG and PBDC is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GSG vs. PBDC - Dividend Comparison
GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.89%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBDC Putnam BDC Income ETF | 11.89% | 10.53% | 9.29% | 9.86% | 3.40% |
Drawdowns
GSG vs. PBDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSG drawdown since its inception was -89.62%, which is greater than PBDC's maximum drawdown of -20.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSG and PBDC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSG | PBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.62% | -20.47% | -69.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -20.15% | +8.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.22% | -18.70% | -39.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.77% | -4.15% | -59.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.27% | 9.54% | -5.27% |
Volatility
GSG vs. PBDC - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a higher volatility of 11.23% compared to Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) at 6.39%. This indicates that GSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSG | PBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.23% | 6.39% | +4.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.29% | 14.34% | +1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.14% | 21.68% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 16.75% | +5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 16.75% | +5.02% |