PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSFIX vs. SSAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSFIX vs. SSAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Core Fixed Income Fund (GSFIX) and State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio (SSAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSFIX achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than SSAFX's -0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, GSFIX has underperformed SSAFX with an annualized return of 1.58%, while SSAFX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.54% annualized return.


GSFIX

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.20%
6M
-0.99%
YTD
-0.77%
1Y
2.15%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
-0.75%
10Y*
1.58%
ALL TIME*
3.95%

SSAFX

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.87%
6M
-0.53%
YTD
-0.34%
1Y
2.14%
3Y*
3.68%
5Y*
-0.47%
10Y*
27.54%
ALL TIME*
23.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GSFIX vs. SSAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSFIX
Goldman Sachs Core Fixed Income Fund
-0.77%7.70%0.81%5.98%-14.72%-1.75%9.92%10.60%-0.51%3.46%
SSAFX
State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio
-0.34%6.81%1.34%5.61%-13.30%-1.72%978.57%8.69%-0.12%3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between GSFIX and SSAFX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2014

0.93

The correlation between GSFIX and SSAFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSFIX vs. SSAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GSFIX
GSFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GSFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GSFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SSAFX
SSAFX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SSAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SSAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GSFIX vs. SSAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Core Fixed Income Fund (GSFIX) and State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio (SSAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GSFIXSSAFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.14

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

1.10

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.54

2.77

-0.23

GSFIX vs. SSAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the SSAFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSFIX and SSAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GSFIX vs. SSAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSFIX drawdown since its inception was -21.73%, which is greater than SSAFX's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSFIX and SSAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSFIXSSAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.73%

-18.74%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.17%

-2.74%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.84%

-4.97%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

-18.09%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.73%

-18.74%

-2.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.92%

-3.36%

-2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-4.39%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

1.09%

+0.21%

Volatility

GSFIX vs. SSAFX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Core Fixed Income Fund (GSFIX) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio (SSAFX) at 0.97%. This indicates that GSFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSFIXSSAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

0.97%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

2.87%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

3.67%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.24%

5.95%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.47%

277.46%

-271.99%

GSFIX vs. SSAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSFIX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SSAFX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSFIX vs. SSAFX - Dividend Comparison

GSFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than SSAFX's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSFIX
Goldman Sachs Core Fixed Income Fund
3.85%4.10%3.57%3.44%2.17%1.94%4.56%4.40%2.78%2.54%2.58%2.49%
SSAFX
State Street Aggregate Bond Index Portfolio
3.87%3.70%3.76%3.16%2.49%1.90%2.41%2.88%2.82%2.42%2.21%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GSFIX and SSAFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GSFIX has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to SSAFX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSFIX dropped -21.73% vs SSAFX's -18.74%.

GSFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSFIX and SSAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer