PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSDIX vs. EIDOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSDIX vs. EIDOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Debt Fund (GSDIX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I (EIDOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSDIX achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly lower than EIDOX's 6.75% return. Over the past 10 years, GSDIX has underperformed EIDOX with an annualized return of 3.43%, while EIDOX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.93% annualized return.


GSDIX

1D
0.19%
1M
1.13%
YTD
3.07%
6M
3.64%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
11.54%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
3.43%

EIDOX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.01%
YTD
6.75%
6M
8.10%
1Y
19.03%
3Y*
15.06%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSDIX vs. EIDOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSDIX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Debt Fund
3.07%14.46%5.88%12.61%-18.92%-3.05%7.60%13.83%-7.49%9.33%
EIDOX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I
6.75%15.59%14.78%11.40%-6.25%1.52%7.39%18.25%-4.28%12.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GSDIX and EIDOX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.51

The correlation between GSDIX and EIDOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (5 years) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSDIX vs. EIDOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSDIX
GSDIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GSDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
GSDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

EIDOX
EIDOX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EIDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EIDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSDIX vs. EIDOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Debt Fund (GSDIX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I (EIDOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSDIXEIDOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

2.58

-0.90

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

5.41

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.31

21.93

-6.62

GSDIX vs. EIDOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSDIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is lower than the EIDOX Sharpe Ratio of 5.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSDIX and EIDOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSDIXEIDOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21

5.71

-2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

1.74

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

1.68

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

1.73

-0.87

Drawdowns

GSDIX vs. EIDOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSDIX drawdown since its inception was -34.56%, which is greater than EIDOX's maximum drawdown of -19.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSDIX and EIDOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSDIXEIDOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.56%

-19.06%

-15.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.47%

-3.56%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.30%

-3.97%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.65%

-17.42%

-14.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.65%

-19.06%

-12.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-2.47%

-2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.88%

+0.12%

Volatility

GSDIX vs. EIDOX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Debt Fund (GSDIX) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I (EIDOX) at 0.68%. This indicates that GSDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIDOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSDIXEIDOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

0.68%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.95%

2.99%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.78%

3.38%

+1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.29%

4.64%

+2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.27%

4.74%

+2.53%

GSDIX vs. EIDOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSDIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than EIDOX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSDIX vs. EIDOX - Dividend Comparison

GSDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, less than EIDOX's 10.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIDOX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class I
10.71%9.41%8.52%8.97%9.13%7.82%7.66%7.81%8.10%7.85%4.10%0.00%
GSDIX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Debt Fund
5.41%5.62%4.66%4.83%9.31%4.00%3.69%4.41%4.78%4.87%5.25%5.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSDIX and EIDOX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSDIX has higher volatility (1.71%) compared to EIDOX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSDIX dropped -34.56% vs EIDOX's -19.06%.

EIDOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.71 vs 3.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSDIX and EIDOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer