PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSDE.DE vs. ASRM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSDE.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (GSDE.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GSDE.DE

1D
-0.69%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
23.86%
6M
26.63%
1Y
44.74%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
14.84%
10Y*
9.70%

ASRM.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSDE.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSDE.DE
BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR
23.86%13.74%14.93%-12.88%21.59%38.67%-11.20%13.32%-3.71%-5.15%
ASRM.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%-78.40%-3.99%-3.83%0.89%-16.42%-14.47%3.07%-15.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GSDE.DE and ASRM.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2010

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSDE.DE vs. ASRM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSDE.DE
GSDE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GSDE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSDE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSDE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GSDE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSDE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ASRM.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSDE.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (GSDE.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSDE.DEASRM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.60

GSDE.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSDE.DEASRM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

Drawdowns

GSDE.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSDE.DEASRM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

Volatility

GSDE.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSDE.DEASRM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

GSDE.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSDE.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ASRM.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSDE.DE vs. ASRM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither GSDE.DE nor ASRM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GSDE.DE and ASRM.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GSDE.DE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GSDE.DE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ASRM.DE.

GSDE.DE is categorized as Commodities, while ASRM.DE is REIT. GSDE.DE tracks BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll, while ASRM.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GSDE.DE and 0.40% for ASRM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSDE.DE and ASRM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer