GSCGX vs. VITPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund (GSCGX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX).
GSCGX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Apr 20, 1990. VITPX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on May 31, 2001.
Performance
GSCGX vs. VITPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GSCGX vs. VITPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSCGX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund | -4.98% | 15.70% | 38.33% | 26.49% | -19.82% | 24.47% | 22.78% | 32.33% | -2.82% | 31.84% |
VITPX Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares | -3.97% | 17.17% | 25.43% | 26.01% | -19.48% | 25.76% | 20.95% | 30.87% | -5.59% | 20.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSCGX achieves a -4.98% return, which is significantly lower than VITPX's -3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, GSCGX has outperformed VITPX with an annualized return of 15.15%, while VITPX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.67% annualized return.
GSCGX
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- -4.98%
- 6M
- -4.08%
- 1Y
- 15.52%
- 3Y*
- 21.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- 15.15%
VITPX
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- -3.97%
- 6M
- -1.95%
- 1Y
- 17.76%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 13.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSCGX vs. VITPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSCGX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VITPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GSCGX vs. VITPX — Risk / Return Rank
GSCGX
VITPX
GSCGX vs. VITPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund (GSCGX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GSCGX | VITPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.98 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 1.50 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 1.51 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.31 | 7.25 | -1.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSCGX | VITPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.98 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.63 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.75 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.47 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between GSCGX and VITPX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GSCGX vs. VITPX - Dividend Comparison
GSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.75%, more than VITPX's 2.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSCGX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund | 12.75% | 12.12% | 25.42% | 0.46% | 8.75% | 10.68% | 3.70% | 4.03% | 49.12% | 8.67% | 1.45% | 8.72% |
VITPX Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares | 2.61% | 2.64% | 4.14% | 2.41% | 6.48% | 5.38% | 11.57% | 2.91% | 3.93% | 1.90% | 2.80% | 2.30% |
Drawdowns
GSCGX vs. VITPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSCGX drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, roughly equal to the maximum VITPX drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSCGX and VITPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSCGX | VITPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.27% | -55.28% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.24% | -12.41% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.00% | -25.31% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.09% | -34.99% | +0.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -6.21% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.04% | -8.07% | -2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 2.59% | +0.08% |
Volatility
GSCGX vs. VITPX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Core Fund (GSCGX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) have volatilities of 5.69% and 5.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GSCGX | VITPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 5.49% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 9.79% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.93% | 18.61% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 17.37% | +4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.67% | 18.40% | +2.27% |