GRZZX vs. UFPIX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GRZZX (Grizzly Short Fund) and UFPIX (ProFunds UltraShort Latin America Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GRZZX returned -1.35%/yr vs -16.60%/yr for UFPIX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GRZZX charges 1.61%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for UFPIX.

Performance

GRZZX vs. UFPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grizzly Short Fund (GRZZX) and ProFunds UltraShort Latin America Fund (UFPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRZZX achieves a -4.48% return, which is significantly higher than UFPIX's -31.52% return. Over the past 10 years, GRZZX has outperformed UFPIX with an annualized return of -1.35%, while UFPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -16.60% annualized return.

GRZZX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: -4.48%
• 6M: -2.95%
• 1Y: -5.65%
• 3Y*: -6.64%
• 5Y*: -2.94%
• 10Y*: -1.35%

UFPIX

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: -31.52%
• 6M: -32.23%
• 1Y: -53.86%
• 3Y*: 43.55%
• 5Y*: 12.16%
• 10Y*: -16.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRZZX vs. UFPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GRZZX Grizzly Short Fund	-4.48%	-2.98%	-6.74%	-18.72%	22.43%	-15.87%	-41.33%	-29.43%	301.98%	-19.84%
UFPIX ProFunds UltraShort Latin America Fund	-31.52%	-54.35%	1,093.05%	-43.28%	-35.80%	-20.05%	-38.78%	-27.84%	-3.97%	-45.62%

Correlation

The correlation between GRZZX and UFPIX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2007	0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between GRZZX and UFPIX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GRZZX vs. UFPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRZZX

GRZZX Risk / Return Rank: 1
GRZZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
GRZZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
GRZZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
GRZZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
GRZZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

UFPIX

UFPIX Risk / Return Rank: 0
UFPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
UFPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
UFPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
UFPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
UFPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRZZX vs. UFPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzly Short Fund (GRZZX) and ProFunds UltraShort Latin America Fund (UFPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GRZZX	UFPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	-1.32	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.63	-2.27	+1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	0.76	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.51	-0.86	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.13	-1.34	+0.20

GRZZX vs. UFPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRZZX Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is higher than the UFPIX Sharpe Ratio of -1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRZZX and UFPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GRZZX vs. UFPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRZZX drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, smaller than the maximum UFPIX drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRZZX and UFPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRZZX	UFPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.80%	-99.86%	+8.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.89%	-63.51%	+49.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.48%	-75.57%	+46.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.65%	-75.57%	+37.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.45%	-95.97%	+23.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.35%	-99.47%	+10.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.39%	-93.52%	+24.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.39%	40.75%	-34.36%

Volatility

GRZZX vs. UFPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grizzly Short Fund (GRZZX) is 4.56%, while ProFunds UltraShort Latin America Fund (UFPIX) has a volatility of 12.06%. This indicates that GRZZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UFPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRZZX	UFPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.56%	12.06%	-7.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.60%	33.79%	-23.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.04%	41.45%	-27.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.60%	339.55%	-319.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	96.67%	244.31%	-147.64%

GRZZX vs. UFPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRZZX has a 1.61% expense ratio, which is lower than UFPIX's 1.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

GRZZX vs. UFPIX - Dividend Comparison

GRZZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, less than UFPIX's 13.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GRZZX Grizzly Short Fund	4.79%	6.00%	10.30%	6.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.14%
UFPIX ProFunds UltraShort Latin America Fund	13.90%	9.52%	0.00%	2.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRZZX and UFPIX in my portfolio?

GRZZX and UFPIX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GRZZX or UFPIX?

UFPIX has higher volatility (12.06%) compared to GRZZX (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRZZX dropped -91.80% vs UFPIX's -99.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GRZZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.