GRZZX vs. UFPIX
GRZZX (Grizzly Short Fund) and UFPIX (ProFunds UltraShort Latin America Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GRZZX returned -0.87%/yr vs -14.34%/yr for UFPIX. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GRZZX charges 1.61%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for UFPIX.
Performance
GRZZX vs. UFPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRZZX achieves a -9.31% return, which is significantly higher than UFPIX's -35.27% return. Over the past 10 years, GRZZX has outperformed UFPIX with an annualized return of -0.87%, while UFPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -14.34% annualized return.
GRZZX
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- -8.91%
- YTD
- -9.31%
- 1Y
- -8.86%
- 3Y*
- -7.02%
- 5Y*
- -3.92%
- 10Y*
- -0.87%
- ALL TIME*
- -7.08%
UFPIX
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- -6.92%
- 6M
- -7.05%
- YTD
- -35.27%
- 1Y
- -56.56%
- 3Y*
- 39.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- -14.34%
- ALL TIME*
- -21.69%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
GRZZX Grizzly Short Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GRZZX vs. UFPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRZZX Grizzly Short Fund | -9.31% | -2.98% | -6.74% | -18.72% | 22.43% | -15.87% | -41.33% | -29.43% | 301.98% | -19.84% |
UFPIX ProFunds UltraShort Latin America Fund | -35.27% | -54.35% | 1,093.05% | -43.28% | -35.80% | -20.05% | -38.78% | -27.84% | -3.97% | -45.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRZZX and UFPIX is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2007 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GRZZX and UFPIX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRZZX vs. UFPIX — Risk / Return Rank
GRZZX
UFPIX
GRZZX vs. UFPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grizzly Short Fund (GRZZX) and ProFunds UltraShort Latin America Fund (UFPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRZZX | UFPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.74 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | -0.92 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | -1.32 | -0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRZZX vs. UFPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRZZX drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, smaller than the maximum UFPIX drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRZZX and UFPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRZZX | UFPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.80% | -99.86% | +8.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.21% | -61.78% | +45.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.38% | -75.57% | +44.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.33% | -75.57% | +36.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.19% | -94.86% | +21.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.89% | -99.50% | +9.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.48% | -93.55% | +24.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 44.08% | -36.33% |
Volatility
GRZZX vs. UFPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grizzly Short Fund (GRZZX) is 4.20%, while ProFunds UltraShort Latin America Fund (UFPIX) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that GRZZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UFPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRZZX | UFPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 10.59% | -6.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.72% | 32.85% | -22.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.06% | 41.53% | -27.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 339.49% | -319.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.65% | 244.26% | -147.61% |
GRZZX vs. UFPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRZZX has a 1.61% expense ratio, which is lower than UFPIX's 1.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
GRZZX vs. UFPIX - Dividend Comparison
GRZZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, less than UFPIX's 14.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRZZX Grizzly Short Fund | 5.04% | 6.00% | 10.30% | 6.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.14% |
UFPIX ProFunds UltraShort Latin America Fund | 14.70% | 9.52% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRZZX and UFPIX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UFPIX has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to GRZZX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRZZX dropped -91.80% vs UFPIX's -99.86%.
GRZZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.73 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRZZX and UFPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer