PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRT-UN.TO vs. SIS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GRT-UN.TO vs. SIS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) and Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRT-UN.TO achieves a 19.72% return, which is significantly lower than SIS.TO's 33.17% return. Over the past 10 years, GRT-UN.TO has underperformed SIS.TO with an annualized return of 14.48%, while SIS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.59% annualized return.


GRT-UN.TO

1D
0.22%
1M
3.25%
YTD
19.72%
6M
28.31%
1Y
41.14%
3Y*
9.94%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
14.48%

SIS.TO

1D
0.87%
1M
6.35%
YTD
33.17%
6M
40.53%
1Y
61.12%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
17.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRT-UN.TO vs. SIS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
19.72%22.80%-4.30%15.18%-31.88%40.16%22.56%29.65%14.45%15.87%
SIS.TO
Savaria Corporation
33.17%17.77%34.86%12.15%-24.44%35.92%7.37%10.42%-26.61%71.44%

Correlation

The correlation between GRT-UN.TO and SIS.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006

0.12

The correlation between GRT-UN.TO and SIS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$5.83B

SIS.TO:

CA$2.19B

EPS

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$6.39

SIS.TO:

CA$1.10

PE Ratio

GRT-UN.TO:

15.07

SIS.TO:

27.43

PEG Ratio

GRT-UN.TO:

0.93

SIS.TO:

0.43

PS Ratio

GRT-UN.TO:

9.32

SIS.TO:

2.33

PB Ratio

GRT-UN.TO:

1.04

SIS.TO:

3.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$629.87M

SIS.TO:

CA$928.84M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$517.51M

SIS.TO:

CA$362.29M

EBITDA (TTM)

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$513.85M

SIS.TO:

CA$176.47M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRT-UN.TO vs. SIS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRT-UN.TO
GRT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SIS.TO
SIS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SIS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRT-UN.TO vs. SIS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) and Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRT-UN.TOSIS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.45

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

6.32

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

18.52

-8.24

GRT-UN.TO vs. SIS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the SIS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRT-UN.TO and SIS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRT-UN.TOSIS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.60

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.44

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.55

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.39

-0.06

Drawdowns

GRT-UN.TO vs. SIS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.48%, which is greater than SIS.TO's maximum drawdown of -75.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRT-UN.TO and SIS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRT-UN.TOSIS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.48%

-75.48%

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.91%

-9.72%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.99%

-33.99%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.82%

-44.22%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.89%

-62.16%

+17.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.47%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.98%

-20.77%

+3.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

3.31%

+0.70%

Volatility

GRT-UN.TO vs. SIS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) is 5.88%, while Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that GRT-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRT-UN.TOSIS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.88%

6.66%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.87%

19.37%

-4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

23.64%

-4.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.88%

26.92%

-5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.44%

32.32%

-9.88%

Dividends

GRT-UN.TO vs. SIS.TO - Dividend Comparison

GRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than SIS.TO's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
3.61%4.18%4.74%4.21%4.50%2.86%3.43%4.25%5.69%5.31%5.42%1.62%
SIS.TO
Savaria Corporation
1.85%2.40%2.65%3.42%3.62%2.54%3.23%3.11%2.91%1.73%1.98%3.09%

Financials

GRT-UN.TO vs. SIS.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Real Estate Investment Trust and Savaria Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
165.83M
235.55M
(GRT-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(SIS.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

GRT-UN.TO vs. SIS.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Granite Real Estate Investment Trust and Savaria Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
81.0%
39.0%
Portfolio components
GRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 134.27M and revenue of 165.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.

SIS.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported a gross profit of 91.74M and revenue of 235.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

GRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 122.29M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 73.7%.

SIS.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported an operating income of 33.15M and revenue of 235.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.

GRT-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 91.25M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in a net margin of 55.0%.

SIS.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported a net income of 22.68M and revenue of 235.55M, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GRT-UN.TO and SIS.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRT-UN.TO and SIS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer