GRT-UN.TO vs. CRWD
GRT-UN.TO (Granite Real Estate Investment Trust) and CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. GRT-UN.TO operates in REIT - Industrial (Real Estate), while CRWD operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, GRT-UN.TO returned 7.16%/yr vs 27.84%/yr for CRWD. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRT-UN.TO vs. CRWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GRT-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while CRWD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CRWD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRT-UN.TO achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly lower than CRWD's 48.77% return.
GRT-UN.TO
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 5.76%
- YTD
- 17.52%
- 6M
- 23.98%
- 1Y
- 37.73%
- 3Y*
- 9.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 14.52%
CRWD
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 23.94%
- YTD
- 48.77%
- 6M
- 37.34%
- 1Y
- 45.07%
- 3Y*
- 67.12%
- 5Y*
- 27.84%
- 10Y*
- —
GRT-UN.TO vs. CRWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRT-UN.TO Granite Real Estate Investment Trust | 17.52% | 22.80% | -4.30% | 15.18% | -31.88% | 40.16% | 22.56% | 11.07% |
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 48.77% | 30.75% | 45.36% | 136.72% | -45.32% | -3.39% | 314.67% | -22.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRT-UN.TO and CRWD is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019 | 0.17 |
The correlation between GRT-UN.TO and CRWD shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$5.73B
CRWD:
$176.08B
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$6.39
CRWD:
-$0.02
GRT-UN.TO:
9.15
CRWD:
34.09
GRT-UN.TO:
1.02
CRWD:
38.00
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$629.87M
CRWD:
$5.09B
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$517.51M
CRWD:
$3.82B
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$513.85M
CRWD:
$246.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRT-UN.TO vs. CRWD — Risk / Return Rank
GRT-UN.TO
CRWD
GRT-UN.TO vs. CRWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRT-UN.TO | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.20 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 1.16 | +1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.53 | 2.64 | +6.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRT-UN.TO vs. CRWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.48%, which is greater than CRWD's maximum drawdown of -65.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRT-UN.TO and CRWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRT-UN.TO | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.48% | -65.54% | -21.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.91% | -38.93% | +26.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.99% | -43.59% | +15.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.82% | -64.92% | +27.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | -11.50% | +8.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -22.61% | +5.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 17.10% | -13.08% |
Volatility
GRT-UN.TO vs. CRWD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) is 5.69%, while CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a volatility of 18.18%. This indicates that GRT-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRT-UN.TO | CRWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 18.18% | -12.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 37.63% | -22.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.38% | 45.52% | -26.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 50.90% | -29.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 56.57% | -34.13% |
Dividends
GRT-UN.TO vs. CRWD - Dividend Comparison
GRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, while CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GRT-UN.TO Granite Real Estate Investment Trust | 3.68% | 4.18% | 4.74% | 4.21% | 4.50% | 2.86% | 3.43% | 4.25% | 5.69% | 5.31% | 5.42% | 1.62% |
Financials
GRT-UN.TO vs. CRWD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Real Estate Investment Trust and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GRT-UN.TO vs. CRWD - Profitability Comparison
GRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 134.27M and revenue of 165.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.
CRWD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.3%.
GRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 122.29M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 73.7%.
CRWD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -30.60M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.
GRT-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 91.25M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in a net margin of 55.0%.
CRWD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 45.97M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRT-UN.TO and CRWD have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GRT-UN.TO and CRWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer