PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRT-UN.TO vs. BSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GRT-UN.TO vs. BSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) and Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GRT-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while BSX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BSX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRT-UN.TO achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly higher than BSX's -49.75% return. Over the past 10 years, GRT-UN.TO has outperformed BSX with an annualized return of 14.52%, while BSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.35% annualized return.


GRT-UN.TO

1D
0.15%
1M
5.76%
YTD
17.52%
6M
23.98%
1Y
37.73%
3Y*
9.82%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
14.52%

BSX

1D
-0.26%
1M
-9.72%
YTD
-49.75%
6M
-48.55%
1Y
-51.29%
3Y*
-1.36%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
8.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRT-UN.TO vs. BSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
17.52%22.80%-4.30%15.18%-31.88%40.16%22.56%29.65%14.45%15.87%
BSX
Boston Scientific Corporation
-49.75%1.88%67.59%21.97%15.82%18.11%-22.39%22.68%54.54%6.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GRT-UN.TO and BSX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$5.73B

BSX:

$70.13B

EPS

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$6.39

BSX:

$2.38

PE Ratio

GRT-UN.TO:

14.79

BSX:

19.74

PEG Ratio

GRT-UN.TO:

0.91

BSX:

0.44

PS Ratio

GRT-UN.TO:

9.15

BSX:

3.40

PB Ratio

GRT-UN.TO:

1.02

BSX:

2.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$629.87M

BSX:

$20.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$517.51M

BSX:

$14.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$513.85M

BSX:

$4.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRT-UN.TO vs. BSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRT-UN.TO
GRT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

BSX
BSX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRT-UN.TO vs. BSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) and Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRT-UN.TOBSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.68

+0.66

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

-0.92

+3.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.53

-1.94

+11.47

GRT-UN.TO vs. BSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the BSX Sharpe Ratio of -1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRT-UN.TO and BSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRT-UN.TO vs. BSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.48%, roughly equal to the maximum BSX drawdown of -91.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRT-UN.TO and BSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRT-UN.TOBSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.48%

-91.92%

+4.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.91%

-56.14%

+43.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.99%

-56.88%

+28.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.82%

-56.88%

+19.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.89%

-56.88%

+11.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-56.88%

+54.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-47.69%

+30.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

26.43%

-22.41%

Volatility

GRT-UN.TO vs. BSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) is 5.69%, while Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) has a volatility of 16.05%. This indicates that GRT-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRT-UN.TOBSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

16.05%

-10.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

33.04%

-17.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.38%

35.05%

-15.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.88%

26.21%

-4.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.44%

27.81%

-5.37%

Dividends

GRT-UN.TO vs. BSX - Dividend Comparison

GRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, while BSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSX
Boston Scientific Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
3.68%4.18%4.74%4.21%4.50%2.86%3.43%4.25%5.69%5.31%5.42%1.62%

Financials

GRT-UN.TO vs. BSX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Real Estate Investment Trust and Boston Scientific Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
165.83M
5.20B
(GRT-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(BSX) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GRT-UN.TO values in CAD, BSX values in USD

GRT-UN.TO vs. BSX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Granite Real Estate Investment Trust and Boston Scientific Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%20222023202420252026
81.0%
69.4%
Portfolio components
GRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 134.27M and revenue of 165.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.

BSX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boston Scientific Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.61B and revenue of 5.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.

GRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 122.29M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 73.7%.

BSX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boston Scientific Corporation reported an operating income of 1.07B and revenue of 5.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

GRT-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 91.25M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in a net margin of 55.0%.

BSX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boston Scientific Corporation reported a net income of 1.34B and revenue of 5.20B, resulting in a net margin of 25.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GRT-UN.TO and BSX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRT-UN.TO and BSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer