GRT-UN.TO vs. AME
GRT-UN.TO (Granite Real Estate Investment Trust) and AME (AMETEK, Inc.) are both stocks. GRT-UN.TO operates in REIT - Industrial (Real Estate), while AME operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, GRT-UN.TO returned 14.52%/yr vs 18.90%/yr for AME. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRT-UN.TO vs. AME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GRT-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while AME is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AME values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRT-UN.TO achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly higher than AME's 13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, GRT-UN.TO has underperformed AME with an annualized return of 14.52%, while AME has yielded a comparatively higher 18.90% annualized return.
GRT-UN.TO
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 5.76%
- YTD
- 17.52%
- 6M
- 23.98%
- 1Y
- 37.73%
- 3Y*
- 9.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 14.52%
AME
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 13.16%
- 6M
- 14.49%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 14.81%
- 10Y*
- 18.90%
GRT-UN.TO vs. AME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRT-UN.TO Granite Real Estate Investment Trust | 17.52% | 22.80% | -4.30% | 15.18% | -31.88% | 40.16% | 22.56% | 29.65% | 14.45% | 15.87% |
AME AMETEK, Inc. | 13.16% | 9.43% | 19.33% | 15.98% | 1.73% | 22.26% | 19.29% | 42.16% | 2.02% | 39.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRT-UN.TO and AME is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$5.73B
AME:
$52.20B
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$6.39
AME:
$6.62
GRT-UN.TO:
14.79
AME:
34.32
GRT-UN.TO:
0.91
AME:
3.20
GRT-UN.TO:
9.15
AME:
6.90
GRT-UN.TO:
1.02
AME:
4.36
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$629.87M
AME:
$7.60B
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$517.51M
AME:
$2.06B
GRT-UN.TO:
CA$513.85M
AME:
$2.15B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRT-UN.TO vs. AME — Risk / Return Rank
GRT-UN.TO
AME
GRT-UN.TO vs. AME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) and AMETEK, Inc. (AME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRT-UN.TO | AME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.25 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 2.37 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.53 | 7.73 | +1.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRT-UN.TO vs. AME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRT-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.48%, which is greater than AME's maximum drawdown of -40.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRT-UN.TO and AME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRT-UN.TO | AME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.48% | -40.78% | -46.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.91% | -12.72% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.99% | -22.36% | -5.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.82% | -26.26% | -11.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.89% | -37.63% | -7.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | -3.59% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -7.48% | -9.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 3.90% | +0.12% |
Volatility
GRT-UN.TO vs. AME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) is 5.69%, while AMETEK, Inc. (AME) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that GRT-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRT-UN.TO | AME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 6.99% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 16.87% | -1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.38% | 22.42% | -3.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 22.81% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 25.36% | -2.92% |
Dividends
GRT-UN.TO vs. AME - Dividend Comparison
GRT-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than AME's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AME AMETEK, Inc. | 0.56% | 0.60% | 0.62% | 0.61% | 0.63% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.56% | 0.83% | 0.50% | 0.74% | 0.67% |
GRT-UN.TO Granite Real Estate Investment Trust | 3.68% | 4.18% | 4.74% | 4.21% | 4.50% | 2.86% | 3.43% | 4.25% | 5.69% | 5.31% | 5.42% | 1.62% |
Financials
GRT-UN.TO vs. AME - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Granite Real Estate Investment Trust and AMETEK, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GRT-UN.TO vs. AME - Profitability Comparison
GRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 134.27M and revenue of 165.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.
AME - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMETEK, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 122.29M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 73.7%.
AME - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMETEK, Inc. reported an operating income of 514.94M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.7%.
GRT-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 91.25M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in a net margin of 55.0%.
AME - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AMETEK, Inc. reported a net income of 399.36M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRT-UN.TO and AME have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GRT-UN.TO and AME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer