PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRPZ vs. MMSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GRPZ vs. MMSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) and First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GRPZ vs. MMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GRPZ
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
3.13%3.09%4.27%
MMSC
First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF
-0.98%15.45%6.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRPZ achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly higher than MMSC's -0.98% return.


GRPZ

1D
2.47%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
3.13%
6M
2.96%
1Y
17.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MMSC

1D
4.82%
1M
-6.15%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
1.92%
1Y
30.40%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GRPZ vs. MMSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRPZ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MMSC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GRPZ vs. MMSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRPZ
GRPZ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GRPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GRPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

MMSC
MMSC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MMSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MMSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRPZ vs. MMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) and First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRPZMMSCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

1.16

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

1.70

-0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.23

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

2.05

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.40

7.28

-2.88

GRPZ vs. MMSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRPZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the MMSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRPZ and MMSC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRPZMMSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.16

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.14

+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between GRPZ and MMSC is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GRPZ vs. MMSC - Dividend Comparison

GRPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while MMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

GRPZ vs. MMSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRPZ drawdown since its inception was -27.87%, smaller than the maximum MMSC drawdown of -40.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPZ and MMSC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GRPZMMSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.87%

-40.82%

+12.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.12%

-14.17%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.84%

-9.96%

+3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-19.44%

+12.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

3.98%

0.00%

Volatility

GRPZ vs. MMSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) is 5.70%, while First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that GRPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GRPZMMSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

10.00%

-4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.71%

18.07%

-5.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.51%

26.46%

-3.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.59%

24.54%

-2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

24.54%

-2.95%