PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRPZ vs. BKSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRPZ vs. BKSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRPZ achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly lower than BKSE's 13.03% return.


GRPZ

1D
-0.67%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
10.84%
6M
8.51%
1Y
21.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BKSE

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.60%
YTD
13.03%
6M
12.11%
1Y
32.65%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRPZ vs. BKSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GRPZ
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
10.84%3.09%4.27%
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
13.03%13.09%7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GRPZ and BKSE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024

0.93

The correlation between GRPZ and BKSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

GRPZ vs. BKSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GRPZ
BKSE

Financial Services

28.0%
16.4%

Industrials

16.3%
15.4%

Healthcare

14.4%
11.4%

Energy

13.0%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
13.3%

Technology

7.9%
16.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
3.2%

Basic Materials

2.2%
4.5%

Communication Services

0.9%
2.2%

Real Estate

-

6.6%

Utilities

-

3.4%

Financial Services

GRPZ
28.0%
BKSE
16.4%

Industrials

GRPZ
16.3%
BKSE
15.4%

Healthcare

GRPZ
14.4%
BKSE
11.4%

Energy

GRPZ
13.0%
BKSE
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GRPZ
12.0%
BKSE
13.3%

Technology

GRPZ
7.9%
BKSE
16.8%

Consumer Defensive

GRPZ
5.3%
BKSE
3.2%

Basic Materials

GRPZ
2.2%
BKSE
4.5%

Communication Services

GRPZ
0.9%
BKSE
2.2%

Real Estate

GRPZ

-

BKSE
6.6%

Utilities

GRPZ

-

BKSE
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRPZ vs. BKSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRPZ
GRPZ Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GRPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
GRPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

BKSE
BKSE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BKSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKSE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BKSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRPZ vs. BKSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GRPZBKSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.32

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

3.49

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.59

12.15

-5.57

GRPZ vs. BKSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRPZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the BKSE Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRPZ and BKSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GRPZBKSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.87

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.73

-0.34

Drawdowns

GRPZ vs. BKSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRPZ drawdown since its inception was -27.87%, roughly equal to the maximum BKSE drawdown of -29.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRPZ and BKSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRPZBKSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.87%

-29.08%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.53%

-9.40%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.57%

-1.11%

-2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-9.06%

+2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

2.69%

+0.63%

Volatility

GRPZ vs. BKSE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) at 4.47%. This indicates that GRPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRPZBKSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

4.47%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.85%

11.96%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

17.63%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.17%

21.43%

-0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.17%

22.30%

-1.13%

GRPZ vs. BKSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRPZ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BKSE's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRPZ vs. BKSE - Dividend Comparison

GRPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than BKSE's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
1.16%1.26%1.55%1.38%1.50%1.17%0.82%
GRPZ
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
0.91%0.97%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GRPZ and BKSE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GRPZ has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to BKSE (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRPZ dropped -27.87% vs BKSE's -29.08%.

On 1-year performance, BKSE leads with 32.65% vs 21.80% for GRPZ. On fees, BKSE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKSE has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BKSE has performed better with a 32.65% return vs 21.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKSE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GRPZ.

BKSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.91% for GRPZ.

GRPZ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 GARP Index, while BKSE tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GRPZ and 0.04% for BKSE.

BKSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRPZ and BKSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer