GRNV.AX vs. CETF.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

GRNV.AX (VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF) and CETF.AX (VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GRNV.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity Index, while CETF.AX is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China A50 Net Tax AUD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GRNV.AX returned 5.10%/yr vs 5.29%/yr for CETF.AX. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GRNV.AX vs. CETF.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF (GRNV.AX) and VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF (CETF.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRNV.AX achieves a -5.59% return, which is significantly lower than CETF.AX's -0.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GRNV.AX having a 5.10% annualized return and CETF.AX not far ahead at 5.29%.

GRNV.AX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -0.61%
• 6M: -5.39%
• YTD: -5.59%
• 1Y: -5.50%
• 3Y*: 6.15%
• 5Y*: 3.91%
• 10Y*: 5.10%

CETF.AX

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -1.13%
• 6M: -2.24%
• YTD: -0.98%
• 1Y: 11.65%
• 3Y*: 9.83%
• 5Y*: 0.64%
• 10Y*: 5.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRNV.AX vs. CETF.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GRNV.AX VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF	-5.59%	8.50%	11.86%	14.17%	-13.00%	18.36%	2.26%	24.45%	-4.99%	6.04%
CETF.AX VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF	-0.98%	12.88%	30.64%	-13.18%	-16.50%	-1.23%	18.52%	33.28%	-18.45%	21.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GRNV.AX and CETF.AX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2016	0.09

The correlation between GRNV.AX and CETF.AX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (3 years) to 0.09 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GRNV.AX vs. CETF.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRNV.AX

GRNV.AX Risk / Return Rank: 7
GRNV.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
GRNV.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
GRNV.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
GRNV.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
GRNV.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

CETF.AX

CETF.AX Risk / Return Rank: 24
CETF.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
CETF.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CETF.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CETF.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CETF.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNV.AX vs. CETF.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF (GRNV.AX) and VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF (CETF.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GRNV.AX	CETF.AX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.28	0.76	-1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.28	1.11	-1.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.14	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.24	0.97	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.48	2.38	-2.86

GRNV.AX vs. CETF.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRNV.AX Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the CETF.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRNV.AX and CETF.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GRNV.AX vs. CETF.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNV.AX drawdown since its inception was -37.16%, smaller than the maximum CETF.AX drawdown of -41.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNV.AX and CETF.AX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRNV.AX	CETF.AX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.16%	-41.32%	+4.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.26%	-12.01%	-7.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.26%	-19.05%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.56%	-33.90%	+13.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.16%	-40.95%	+3.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.07%	-11.36%	-0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.20%	-23.78%	+17.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.91%	4.95%	+4.96%

Volatility

GRNV.AX vs. CETF.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF (GRNV.AX) is 3.24%, while VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF (CETF.AX) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that GRNV.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CETF.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRNV.AX	CETF.AX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.24%	5.19%	-1.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.34%	11.75%	+0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.82%	15.18%	+1.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.97%	19.75%	-4.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.51%	20.06%	-4.55%

Dividends

GRNV.AX vs. CETF.AX - Dividend Comparison

GRNV.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than CETF.AX's 1.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CETF.AX VanEck FTSE China A50 ETF	1.87%	1.94%	1.55%	2.94%	2.80%	1.80%	1.30%	1.28%	11.56%	1.08%	1.16%	3.19%
GRNV.AX VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity ETF	2.10%	3.34%	1.53%	1.72%	0.62%	2.33%	3.88%	4.82%	3.98%	4.10%	0.76%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRNV.AX and CETF.AX in my portfolio?

GRNV.AX and CETF.AX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between GRNV.AX and CETF.AX?

GRNV.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while CETF.AX is China Equities. GRNV.AX tracks VanEck MSCI Australian Sustainable Equity Index, while CETF.AX tracks FTSE China A50 Net Tax AUD Index.