GRHIX vs. GLPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund (GRHIX) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX).
GRHIX is managed by Goehring & Rozencwajg. It was launched on Dec 29, 2016. GLPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Mar 27, 2013.
Performance
GRHIX vs. GLPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GRHIX vs. GLPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRHIX Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund | 21.33% | 61.65% | -1.51% | 16.61% | 16.38% | 62.15% | -2.74% | 0.01% | -30.03% | -0.96% |
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 15.76% | 4.45% | 28.00% | 19.67% | 26.06% | 39.89% | -31.08% | 7.04% | -14.57% | -6.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRHIX achieves a 21.33% return, which is significantly higher than GLPIX's 15.76% return.
GRHIX
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- YTD
- 21.33%
- 6M
- 30.10%
- 1Y
- 89.80%
- 3Y*
- 30.90%
- 5Y*
- 26.38%
- 10Y*
- —
GLPIX
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 15.76%
- 6M
- 18.33%
- 1Y
- 11.86%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GRHIX vs. GLPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GRHIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than GLPIX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GRHIX vs. GLPIX — Risk / Return Rank
GRHIX
GLPIX
GRHIX vs. GLPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund (GRHIX) and Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRHIX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.12 | 0.82 | +2.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.48 | 1.11 | +2.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.17 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.65 | 0.91 | +4.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.93 | 2.28 | +18.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRHIX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.12 | 0.82 | +2.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 1.16 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.19 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between GRHIX and GLPIX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GRHIX vs. GLPIX - Dividend Comparison
GRHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than GLPIX's 6.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRHIX Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund | 2.80% | 3.39% | 4.02% | 3.19% | 1.21% | 3.25% | 2.03% | 0.57% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLPIX Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.27% | 7.03% | 6.60% | 6.70% | 6.00% | 6.26% | 9.72% | 8.67% | 8.02% | 7.49% | 11.46% | 6.62% |
Drawdowns
GRHIX vs. GLPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRHIX drawdown since its inception was -70.61%, smaller than the maximum GLPIX drawdown of -75.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRHIX and GLPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRHIX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.61% | -75.98% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.02% | -13.62% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.47% | -20.89% | -10.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | -2.01% | -2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.48% | -23.43% | +4.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 5.41% | -1.07% |
Volatility
GRHIX vs. GLPIX - Volatility Comparison
Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Fund (GRHIX) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLPIX) at 3.03%. This indicates that GRHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GRHIX | GLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.04% | 3.03% | +5.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.99% | 7.61% | +13.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.26% | 15.46% | +13.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.52% | 19.22% | +10.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.67% | 26.08% | +3.59% |