PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQJPX vs. WHGMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQJPX vs. WHGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQJPX) and Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund (WHGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQJPX achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than WHGMX's 14.93% return.


GQJPX

1D
-0.31%
1M
4.98%
6M
4.52%
YTD
10.50%
1Y
20.10%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.44%

WHGMX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.68%
6M
6.89%
YTD
14.93%
1Y
21.36%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
9.88%
ALL TIME*
9.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GQJPX vs. WHGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GQJPX
GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund
10.50%24.88%7.39%18.06%-10.50%1.05%
WHGMX
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund
14.93%8.40%10.41%17.78%-10.35%5.23%

Correlation

The correlation between GQJPX and WHGMX is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.55

The correlation between GQJPX and WHGMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQJPX vs. WHGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GQJPX
GQJPX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GQJPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQJPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQJPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GQJPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQJPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

WHGMX
WHGMX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
WHGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WHGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
WHGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
WHGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
WHGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GQJPX vs. WHGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQJPX) and Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund (WHGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GQJPXWHGMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.22

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

2.06

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.95

6.77

-0.82

GQJPX vs. WHGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQJPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the WHGMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQJPX and WHGMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GQJPX vs. WHGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQJPX drawdown since its inception was -21.83%, smaller than the maximum WHGMX drawdown of -47.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQJPX and WHGMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQJPXWHGMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.83%

-47.99%

+26.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

-9.68%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.45%

-23.78%

+14.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.83%

-23.78%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-2.59%

+1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-7.15%

+1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

2.94%

+0.49%

Volatility

GQJPX vs. WHGMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQJPX) is 2.93%, while Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund (WHGMX) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that GQJPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WHGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQJPXWHGMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

3.70%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

11.83%

-3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.53%

15.88%

-5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.84%

18.73%

-5.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.89%

20.26%

-7.37%

GQJPX vs. WHGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQJPX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than WHGMX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQJPX vs. WHGMX - Dividend Comparison

GQJPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than WHGMX's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQJPX
GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund
3.80%3.22%3.35%4.50%5.59%1.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WHGMX
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund
4.52%5.19%1.21%2.92%1.52%16.39%2.83%11.93%19.09%12.12%1.40%7.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQJPX and WHGMX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WHGMX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to GQJPX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQJPX dropped -21.83% vs WHGMX's -47.99%.

GQJPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQJPX and WHGMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer