PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GQETX vs. QCELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GQETX vs. QCELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Quality Fund (GQETX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQETX achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly lower than QCELX's 17.15% return. Over the past 10 years, GQETX has outperformed QCELX with an annualized return of 16.09%, while QCELX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.11% annualized return.


GQETX

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.77%
YTD
4.97%
6M
6.14%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
13.06%
10Y*
16.09%

QCELX

1D
-0.80%
1M
4.85%
YTD
17.15%
6M
18.57%
1Y
37.68%
3Y*
27.14%
5Y*
15.79%
10Y*
15.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQETX vs. QCELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GQETX
GMO Quality Fund
4.97%19.61%17.76%28.94%-15.33%31.67%18.33%31.77%0.50%29.11%
QCELX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund
17.15%23.38%22.73%26.30%-15.73%27.18%14.93%24.33%-10.96%22.73%

Correlation

The correlation between GQETX and QCELX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.89

The correlation between GQETX and QCELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GQETX vs. QCELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQETX
GQETX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GQETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQETX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GQETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQETX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

QCELX
QCELX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QCELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCELX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QCELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQETX vs. QCELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Quality Fund (GQETX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GQETXQCELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.52

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

4.73

-3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.83

21.72

-14.89

GQETX vs. QCELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQETX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the QCELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQETX and QCELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GQETXQCELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.93

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.84

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.80

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.72

0.00

Drawdowns

GQETX vs. QCELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQETX drawdown since its inception was -39.99%, which is greater than QCELX's maximum drawdown of -33.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQETX and QCELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GQETXQCELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.99%

-33.52%

-6.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

-7.92%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-18.38%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.22%

-28.70%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.44%

-33.52%

+3.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-1.05%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-5.65%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

1.72%

+1.50%

Volatility

GQETX vs. QCELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Quality Fund (GQETX) is 2.91%, while AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) has a volatility of 3.22%. This indicates that GQETX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GQETXQCELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

3.22%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.49%

9.37%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.27%

12.78%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

18.93%

-3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

18.97%

-1.90%

GQETX vs. QCELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQETX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QCELX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

GQETX vs. QCELX - Dividend Comparison

GQETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.63%, less than QCELX's 12.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQETX
GMO Quality Fund
10.63%11.16%3.91%3.43%11.85%10.19%13.61%8.08%21.66%8.10%3.56%17.25%
QCELX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund
12.29%14.40%12.89%13.67%11.05%12.41%9.94%5.36%7.81%0.99%1.28%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


GQETX and QCELX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QCELX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to GQETX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQETX dropped -39.99% vs QCELX's -33.52%.

QCELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GQETX and QCELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer